Noosa North Shore vs Como
Como is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 55 in Noosa North Shore. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Noosa North Shore tends to suit older residents, while Como suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Como
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 52/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (50% vs 41%)
- But Noosa North Shore has more parks and reserves (15 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Noosa North Shore
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($500/wk vs $595/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Noosa North Shore
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (131 min vs 146 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (159.9 km vs 167.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Noosa North Shore has more residents already 65 and over (30% vs 18%)
- Como carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 52/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Noosa North Shore
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (41.3% vs 17.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Noosa North Shore and Como drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Noosa North Shore has more residents (253 vs 54); Noosa North Shore skews older (55 vs 45).
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 253 +79% vs other | 54 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +41.3% | +17.4% |
| Median age | 55 | 45 |
| Median household income | $58,500/yr | $68,224/yr +17% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk | $595/wk +19% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 50 days from 4 sales | — |
Development activity
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 239 across Noosa same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -9% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 21% of QLD | Higher than 35% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 16% of QLD | Higher than 47% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 77% of QLD | Higher than 62% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 38% of QLD | Higher than 45% of QLD |
Liveability
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Noosa North Shore carries more crime risk (52 vs 36).
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 80/100 | High 81/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 52/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 92/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 2 |
| Waterways | 5 | 7 |
Mobility
Como sits further from the CBD (167.8 km vs 159.9 km).
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 159.9 km | 167.8 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 131 min | 146 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 4565 | 0.4% postcode 4571 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 73 postcode 4565 | 75 postcode 4571 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.4%).
Setting
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 2 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 25 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.4 km | 9.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 127 premises | 0% 25 premises |
Climate
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,031 mm | 1,045 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.8°C | 30.9°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 15.3°C | 7.7°C |
Council rates
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,614/yr same for both | |
| Council | Noosa same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wide Bay same for both | |
| Member | Llew O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Noosa North Shore | Como | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Noosa North Shore
Other comparisons with Como
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.