Nobby vs Mount Molar
Nobby is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 53 in Mount Molar. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Nobby tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Nobby
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 56/100)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- But Mount Molar is already more of a family suburb (71% vs 62%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Nobby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 30%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Molar
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 22%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Nobby
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (134 min vs 147 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (163 km vs 168.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Nobby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 56/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Nobby
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.2% vs 1.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Nobby and Mount Molar drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Nobby has more residents (609 vs 117); Mount Molar has higher household incomes ($94,224 vs $63,180).
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 609 +81% vs other | 117 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.2% | +1.7% |
| Median age | 46 | 53 |
| Median household income | $63,180/yr | $94,224/yr +49% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $265/wk | $270/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Property market
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $592,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $420,000 | — |
Development activity
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 29% of QLD | Higher than 68% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 30% of QLD | Higher than 45% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of QLD | Higher than 8% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 56% of QLD | Higher than 60% of QLD |
Liveability
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 52/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Molar carries more crime risk (56 vs 25).
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 25/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Nobby
- Nobby State School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Mount Molar
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Molar sits further from the CBD (168.9 km vs 163 km).
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 163 km | 168.9 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 134 min | 147 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 4360 | 0.1% postcode 4361 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 91 postcode 4360 | 66 postcode 4361 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.1%).
Setting
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 490 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 516 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 255 premises | 0% 52 premises |
Climate
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 643 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Groom | Maranoa |
| Member | Garth Hamilton | David Littleproud |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Nobby | Mount Molar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Nobby
Mount Molar
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Nobby
Other comparisons with Mount Molar
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.