Nirimba Fields vs Quakers Hill
Nirimba Fields is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 35 in Quakers Hill. In both, most homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. In Nirimba Fields, about half of households rent. In Quakers Hill, most households own their home. Quakers Hill is closer to the city centre: 42.2 km, against 52.5 km. On these figures, Nirimba Fields tends to suit renters and young adults.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Quakers Hill
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (16 vs 1)
- has more childcare (22 vs 2)
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Nirimba Fields
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($780,000 vs $1,410,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Nirimba Fields
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (51% vs 30%)
- has cheaper rent ($410/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Quakers Hill
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (76/100 vs 47/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (42.2 km vs 52.5 km)
- has a shorter drive in (40 min vs 49 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Quakers Hill
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (9 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (10% vs 4%)
- is more walkable (76/100 vs 47/100)
- But Nirimba Fields has more units and townhouses to downsize into (39% vs 29%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Nirimba Fields and Quakers Hill drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Quakers Hill has more residents (27,893 vs 1,632); Quakers Hill skews older (35 vs 31).
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,632 | 27,893 +1609% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +3.0% |
| Median age | 31 | 35 |
| Median household income | $133,484/yr +10% vs other | $120,120/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $410/wk | $450/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (40.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,220,500 | $1,300,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $839,000 |
| Median land price | $780,000 | $1,410,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 24 days from 350 sales |
Zoning mix
Nirimba Fields has more land zoned for conservation (20% vs 2%).
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 27% | 67% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 44% | 17% |
| Environmental | 20% | 2% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 9% |
| Commercial | 0% | 1% |
| Planning zones cover 100% of Nirimba Fields and 96% of Quakers Hill. The rest is unzoned land such as water or road reserve. | ||
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.3% $730/wk on $1.15M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 43% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 80% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 34% of NSW |
Liveability
Quakers Hill is more walkable (76 vs 47); Quakers Hill scores higher overall (67 vs 52).
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 52/100 | 67/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Nirimba Fields carries more bushfire risk (19 vs 0); Nirimba Fields carries more crime risk (57 vs 39).
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 8 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 4 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Nirimba Fields
- Nirimba Fields Public School Government · Primary at peers
- St John Paul II Catholic College (Nirimba) Catholic · Secondary
- Wyndham College Government · Secondary
Schools in Quakers Hill
- Quakers Hill Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Barnier Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Hambledon Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Mary Immaculate Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Quakers Hill High School Government · Secondary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 16 |
| Childcare | 2 | 22 |
| GPs | 0 | 9 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 2 |
Mobility
Nirimba Fields sits further from the CBD (52.5 km vs 42.2 km).
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 47/100 | 76/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 52.5 km +20% vs other | 42.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 49 min | 40 min |
| Public transport score | 58/100 Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 15.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 427.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 3 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 2763 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 53 postcode 2763 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (53.8%).
Setting
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 24 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 36 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 36.0 km | 34.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 91% 1,334 premises | 8% 9,480 premises |
Climate
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 932 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.53 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chifley | Greenway |
| Member | Ed Husic | Michelle Rowland |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Nirimba Fields | Quakers Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Nirimba Fields
Quakers Hill
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Nirimba Fields
Other comparisons with Quakers Hill
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.