Newport vs Port Melbourne
Newport is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 42 in Port Melbourne. In both, most households own their home. In Newport, most homes are detached houses and about half of households are couple families. In Port Melbourne, about half of homes are flats or apartments and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Port Melbourne: a median of $1.5 million, against $1.2 million in Newport, and rent is higher there too. Port Melbourne is closer to the city centre: 5.9 km, against 11.8 km. On these figures, Newport tends to suit families with children, couples, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Port Melbourne suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Newport
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (67% vs 6%)
- is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 41%)
- has more schools inside the suburb (6 vs 4)
- But Port Melbourne has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Newport
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,200,000 vs $1,500,000)
- has cheaper units ($572,000 vs $667,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Newport
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 23%)
- has cheaper rent ($471/wk vs $540/wk)
- But Port Melbourne has a bigger rental market to choose from (44% vs 29%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Port Melbourne
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (5.9 km vs 11.8 km)
- has a shorter drive in (14 min vs 21 min)
- But Newport is more walkable (77/100 vs 68/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Newport carries lower crime risk (63/100 vs 89/100)
- Port Melbourne has more GPs (7 vs 2)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Newport and Port Melbourne drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Port Melbourne has more residents (17,633 vs 13,658); Port Melbourne rents higher ($540/wk vs $471/wk).
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,658 | 17,633 +29% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.7% | +9.0% |
| Median age | 38 | 42 |
| Median household income | $138,164/yr +11% vs other | $123,344/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $471/wk | $540/wk +15% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,200,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Median unit price | $572,000 | $667,500 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 149 sales | 24 days from 115 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 93 sales
44 vs 182 sales
7 vs 32 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
53 vs 71 sales
198 vs 76 sales
69 vs 22 sales
15 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
Port Melbourne has more commercially zoned land (47% vs 3%); Port Melbourne has more industrially zoned land (13% vs 2%).
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 58% | 20% |
| Commercial | 3% | 47% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 19% | 10% |
| Parks and recreation | 15% | 9% |
| Industrial | 2% | 13% |
| Other and special use | 2% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,028 across Hobsons Bay | 891 across Port Phillip |
| Approvals change year on year | +206% | +4175% |
Gross rental yield
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $765/wk on $1.15M | 3.5% $1,025/wk on $1.51M |
| Units | 5.2% $498/wk on $502K | 5.5% $780/wk on $735K |
Ranking within VIC
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 74% of VIC | Higher than 93% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 96% of VIC | Higher than 92% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 24% of VIC | Higher than 57% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of VIC | Higher than 89% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 65% of VIC | Higher than 16% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of VIC | Higher than 98% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 81% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 34% of VIC | Higher than 38% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 69% of VIC | Higher than 84% of VIC |
Liveability
Newport is more walkable (77 vs 68).
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A same for both | |
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Port Melbourne carries more flood risk (37 vs 19); Port Melbourne carries more crime risk (89 vs 63).
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 63/100 | High 89/100 |
| Flood | Low 19/100 | Low 37/100 |
| Coastal erosion | Low 25/100 | High 76/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 37 within 5 km | 36 within 5 km |
Schools
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 3 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Victoria University Footscray Park, 5.3 km | 3 Melbourne C.Q.U Campus, 4.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Schools in Newport
- Newport Gardens Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Newport Lakes Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Sacred Heart School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Australian Islamic Centre College Independent · Primary below peers
- Bayside P-12 College-Paisley Campus Government · Combined
- Westbourne Grammar School - Williamstown Campus Independent · Combined
Schools in Port Melbourne
- Port Melbourne Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Port Melbourne Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Albert Park College-Environmental Arts Hub Government · Secondary
- Port Phillip Specialist School Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 13 | 55 |
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 30 |
| Childcare | 11 | 8 |
| GPs | 2 | 7 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 4 |
| Waterways | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
Newport sits further from the CBD (11.8 km vs 5.9 km).
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 77/100 | 68/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 11.8 km +50% vs other | 5.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 21 min | 14 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 94/100 Tram · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 221.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 654.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 3015 | 2.9% postcode 3207 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 23 postcode 3015 | 7 postcode 3207 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (52.1%).
Setting
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.4 km 2.8 km to a named beach | 792 m 813 m to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 85/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the building |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 48% 6,160 premises | 18% 12,195 premises |
Climate
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 482 mm | 534 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.9°C | 26.7°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.2°C | 6.5°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — | 7.9 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.81 pphm | — |
Council rates
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,677/yr | $1,765/yr |
| Council | Hobsons Bay | Port Phillip |
Federal electorate
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gellibrand | Macnamara |
| Member | Tim Watts | Josh Burns |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Newport | Port Melbourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Port Melbourne
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Newport
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.