Newport vs Kippa-Ring
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Newport, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Newport: a median of $1.6 million, against $910,000 in Kippa-Ring, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Newport tends to suit couples, while Kippa-Ring suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Kippa-Ring
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more childcare (9 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (14 vs 4)
- But Newport is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 56%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kippa-Ring
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($629,500 vs $1,412,500)
- has cheaper houses ($910,000 vs $1,600,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Kippa-Ring
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 24%)
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $530/wk)
- But Newport leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kippa-Ring
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (87/100 vs 34/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kippa-Ring
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more GPs (5 vs 1)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (22% vs 6%)
- is more walkable (87/100 vs 34/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Newport
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (101.2% vs -0.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Newport and Kippa-Ring drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Newport has higher household incomes ($125,736 vs $67,444); Kippa-Ring has more residents (9,745 vs 5,964).
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,964 | 9,745 +63% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +101.2% | -0.5% |
| Median age | 43 same for both | |
| Median household income | $125,736/yr +46% vs other | $67,444/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $530/wk +34% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,600,000 | $910,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,412,500 | $629,500 |
| Median land price | $1,635,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 39 days from 165 sales | 26 days from 103 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
14 vs 15 sales
20 vs 18 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 112 sales
156 vs 64 sales
57 vs 15 sales
Development activity
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.0% $925/wk on $1.6M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 92% of QLD | Higher than 34% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 38% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of QLD | Higher than 98% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 94% of QLD | Higher than 62% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of QLD | Higher than 86% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 11% of QLD | — |
Liveability
Kippa-Ring is more walkable (87 vs 34); Newport scores higher overall (76 vs 57).
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 76/100 | 57/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 44/100 | — |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 52/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Newport
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Kippa-Ring
- Hercules Road State School Government · Primary at peers
- Kippa-Ring State School Government · Primary at peers
- Southern Cross Catholic College - Kippa-Ring Campus Catholic · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 14 |
| Childcare | 1 | 9 |
| GPs | 1 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 24 | 9 |
Mobility
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 34/100 | 87/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 39.4 km +2% vs other | 38.6 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 42 min | 40 min |
| Public transport score | 72/100 Bus | 89/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 30.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 162.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.0% postcode 4020 | 0.4% postcode 4021 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 4020 | 56 postcode 4021 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.8%).
Setting
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 505 m 2.8 km to a named beach | 2.1 km 3.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 92/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 83% 3,328 premises | 8% 4,843 premises |
Climate
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.43 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Petrie same for both | |
| Member | Emma Comer same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Newport | Kippa-Ring | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kippa-Ring
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Newport
Other comparisons with Kippa-Ring
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.