Nayook vs Piedmont
Nayook is the younger of the two, with a median age of 56 against 60 in Piedmont. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Nayook, about half of households are people living alone. In Piedmont, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Piedmont tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Nayook
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (48% vs 33%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Nayook
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (48% vs 62%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Piedmont
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $280/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Nayook
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (123.6 km vs 127 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Piedmont
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (38% vs 31%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Piedmont
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (13.0% vs -6.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Nayook and Piedmont drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Nayook rents higher ($280/wk vs $0/wk); Nayook has more residents (70 vs 52).
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70 +26% vs other | 52 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -6.7% | +13.0% |
| Median age | 56 | 60 |
| Median household income | $55,224/yr +20% vs other | $44,200/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $280/wk (not reported on the other side) | — |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
Zoning mix
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 86% | 87% |
| Parks and recreation | 14% | 7% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 619 across Baw Baw same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 13% of VIC | Higher than 5% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 11% of VIC | Higher than 44% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 75% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 18% of VIC | Higher than 8% of VIC |
Liveability
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 100/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 30/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Nayook
- Neerim District Rural Primary School Government · Primary
- Rubicon Outdoor School-Nayook Camp Government · Secondary
Schools in Piedmont
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 8 | 11 |
Mobility
Piedmont sits further from the CBD (127 km vs 123.6 km).
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 123.6 km | 127 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 99 min | 102 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3832 | 0.9% postcode 3833 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 52 postcode 3832 | 39 postcode 3833 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.4%).
Setting
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 433 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 286 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 21/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 20 premises | 0% 13 premises |
Climate
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,090 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,138/yr same for both | |
| Council | Baw Baw same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Nayook | Piedmont | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Nayook
Other comparisons with Piedmont
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.