Nankin vs Mount Chalmers
Nankin is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 47 in Mount Chalmers. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Nankin, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Nankin: a median of $1.14 million, against $622,000 in Mount Chalmers, though rent is higher in Mount Chalmers. On these figures, Nankin tends to suit families with children, while Mount Chalmers suits people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Chalmers
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 62/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Chalmers
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($622,055 vs $1,135,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Nankin
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (16% vs 4%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 28%)
- has cheaper rent ($225/wk vs $355/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Nankin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (459 min vs 475 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (654.6 km vs 660.8 km)
- But Mount Chalmers is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Chalmers
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 62/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Nankin
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.5% vs -3.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Nankin and Mount Chalmers drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Chalmers rents higher ($355/wk vs $225/wk); Nankin has higher household incomes ($88,348 vs $65,936).
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176 | 226 +28% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.5% | -3.8% |
| Median age | 43 | 47 |
| Median household income | $88,348/yr +25% vs other | $65,936/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $225/wk | $355/wk +58% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Property market
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,135,000 | $622,055 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 48 days from 6 sales |
Development activity
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 317 across Livingstone same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +97% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 62% of QLD | Higher than 31% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 66% of QLD | Higher than 73% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 18% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 24% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
Liveability
Mount Chalmers is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Nankin carries more crime risk (62 vs 29); Mount Chalmers carries more bushfire risk (74 vs 55).
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 55/100 | High 74/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 62/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | High 95/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Nankin
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Chalmers
- Carinity Education - Rockhampton - Mount Chalmers Campus Independent · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Chalmers sits further from the CBD (660.8 km vs 654.6 km).
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 654.6 km | 660.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 459 min | 475 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4701 | 0.2% postcode 4702 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 4701 | 58 postcode 4702 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.6%).
Setting
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 15 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 79 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.1 km | 13.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 50 premises | 0% 100 premises |
Climate
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 811 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 11.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 8.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,445/yr same for both | |
| Council | Livingstone same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Nankin | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Chalmers
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Nankin
Other comparisons with Mount Chalmers
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.