Nambrok vs Kilmany
Nambrok is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 45 in Kilmany. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Nambrok, most households are couple families. On these figures, Nambrok tends to suit couples, while Kilmany suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Nambrok
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 67/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (64% vs 51%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Nambrok
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (16% vs 23%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kilmany
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($210/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Nambrok
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (200 km vs 202.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Nambrok carries lower crime risk (36/100 vs 67/100)
- Kilmany has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 13%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Nambrok and Kilmany drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Nambrok has more residents (280 vs 165); Nambrok rents higher ($250/wk vs $210/wk).
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 280 +41% vs other | 165 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -6.4% | -3.5% |
| Median age | 39 | 45 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr +14% vs other | $72,748/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk +16% vs other | $210/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.8%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 93% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 209 across Wellington same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +17% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 53% of VIC | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 6% of VIC | Higher than 49% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 19% of VIC | Higher than 33% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 50% of VIC | Higher than 45% of VIC |
Liveability
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Kilmany carries more flood risk (74 vs 0); Kilmany carries more crime risk (67 vs 36).
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | High 74/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Nambrok
- Nambrok Denison Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Kilmany
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 8 | 0 |
Mobility
Kilmany sits further from the CBD (202.6 km vs 200 km).
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 200 km | 202.6 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 146 min | 149 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 3847 | 0.4% postcode 3851 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 53 postcode 3847 | 40 postcode 3851 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (60.6%).
Setting
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 23 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 44.2 km | 36.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 121 premises | 0% 82 premises |
Climate
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 546 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,960/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wellington same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gippsland same for both | |
| Member | Darren Chester same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Nambrok | Kilmany | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Nambrok
Other comparisons with Kilmany
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.