Myrtle Mountain vs Wyndham
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Myrtle Mountain: a median of $790,000, against $600,000 in Wyndham, though rent is higher in Wyndham. On these figures, Myrtle Mountain tends to suit couples, while Wyndham suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Myrtle Mountain is a very small, remote community with just 75 residents, while Wyndham is a larger town with 418 people. Myrtle Mountain offers notably higher household incomes at $84,500 annually compared to Wyndham's $48,932, and median house prices are $789,500 versus $600,000. However, Wyndham has rental availability at $200 per week (Myrtle Mountain shows no rental market), better walkability at 13 versus 8, and lower bushfire and crime risk scores. Both are rural NSW locations far from the CBD, suited to different priorities: Myrtle Mountain appeals to those seeking a quieter, higher-income enclave, while Wyndham offers more amenities, rental options, and lower environmental risk.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Myrtle Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 39/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Myrtle Mountain leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 27%)
- Wyndham has cheaper houses ($600,000 vs $789,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Myrtle Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Myrtle Mountain
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (351 min vs 371 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (505.4 km vs 518.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Myrtle Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 39/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Myrtle Mountain
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (44.2% vs 8.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Myrtle Mountain and Wyndham drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wyndham rents higher ($200/wk vs $0/wk); Wyndham has more residents (418 vs 75).
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75 | 418 +457% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +44.2% | +8.3% |
| Median age | 53 | 55 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr +42% vs other | $48,932/yr |
| Median weekly rent | — | $200/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.6%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $789,500 | $600,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 191 days from 3 sales |
Zoning mix
Myrtle Mountain has more land zoned for conservation (42% vs 26%); Wyndham has more rural and farming land (74% vs 58%).
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 58% | 74% |
| Environmental | 42% | 26% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Bega Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -32% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 32% of NSW | Higher than 24% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 10% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 40% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 69% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 2% of NSW |
Liveability
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Wyndham carries more crime risk (39 vs 0).
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 75/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Myrtle Mountain
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Wyndham
- Wyndham Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 8 |
Mobility
Wyndham sits further from the CBD (518.3 km vs 505.4 km).
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 8/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 505.4 km | 518.3 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 351 min | 371 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2550 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 61 postcode 2550 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.5%).
Setting
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 425 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 278 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 20.3 km | 24.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 28 premises | 0% 69 premises |
Climate
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 768 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,767/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bega Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Eden-monaro same for both | |
| Member | Kristy Mcbain same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Myrtle Mountain | Wyndham | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Myrtle Mountain
Other comparisons with Wyndham
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.