Mutdapilly vs Mount Forbes
Comparing Mutdapilly and Mount Forbes, QLD: Mutdapilly carries more crime risk (29 vs 10); Mount Forbes rents higher ($380/wk vs $300/wk); and Mount Forbes sits further from the CBD (64.9 km vs 61.1 km).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mutdapilly has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- Mount Forbes carries lower crime risk (10/100 vs 29/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Forbes
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (22% vs 29%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mutdapilly
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $380/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mutdapilly
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (61.1 km vs 64.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Forbes
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (10/100 vs 29/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mutdapilly and Mount Forbes drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Forbes rents higher ($380/wk vs $300/wk); Mount Forbes has higher household incomes ($92,092 vs $82,836).
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 308 +15% vs other | 262 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.0% | -0.4% |
| Median age | 44 | 43 |
| Median household income | $82,836/yr | $92,092/yr +11% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $380/wk +27% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.3%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim | 3,476 across Ipswich |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% | -7% |
Ranking within QLD
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 54% of QLD | Higher than 65% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 20% of QLD | Higher than 60% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 66% of QLD | Higher than 63% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 53% of QLD | Higher than 47% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Mutdapilly carries more crime risk (29 vs 10).
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 29/100 | Low 10/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Low 14/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Mutdapilly
- Mutdapilly State School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Mount Forbes
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Forbes sits further from the CBD (64.9 km vs 61.1 km).
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 61.1 km | 64.9 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 52 min | 56 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4307 | 0.4% postcode 4340 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 93 postcode 4307 | 82 postcode 4340 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.3%).
Setting
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 91 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 126 premises | 0% 86 premises |
Climate
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr | $1,713/yr |
| Council | Scenic Rim | Ipswich |
Federal electorate
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright | Blair |
| Member | Scott Buchholz | Shayne Neumann |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland | Australian Labor Party |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mutdapilly | Mount Forbes | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mutdapilly
Other comparisons with Mount Forbes
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.