Murdunna vs Eaglehawk Neck
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Murdunna, most households are people living alone. In Eaglehawk Neck, about half of households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Eaglehawk Neck
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Eaglehawk Neck
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (29% vs 38%)
- has cheaper rent ($270/wk vs $295/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Eaglehawk Neck
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (65 min vs 82 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Eaglehawk Neck
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Murdunna and Eaglehawk Neck drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Eaglehawk Neck has more residents (422 vs 325); Eaglehawk Neck has higher household incomes ($47,788 vs $39,832).
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 325 | 422 +30% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.2% | +9.6% |
| Median age | 56 | 58 |
| Median household income | $39,832/yr | $47,788/yr +20% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $295/wk +8% vs other | $270/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $607,500 | $585,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $300,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 65 days from 5 sales | 42 days from 5 sales |
Zoning mix
Murdunna has more rural and farming land (85% vs 64%); Eaglehawk Neck has more land zoned for conservation (33% vs 14%).
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 85% | 64% |
| Environmental | 14% | 33% |
| Residential | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 14 across Tasman same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.5% $480/wk on $995K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 8% of TAS | Higher than 17% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 44% of TAS | Higher than 75% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of TAS | Higher than 68% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 37% of TAS | Higher than 62% of TAS |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 2% of TAS |
Liveability
Eaglehawk Neck is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 69/100 | High 75/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 38/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 9 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Beaches | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 8 |
Mobility
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 72.1 km | 73.7 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 82 min | 65 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.1% postcode 7178 | 0.6% postcode 7179 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 26 postcode 7178 | 22 postcode 7179 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.3%).
Setting
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 225 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 167 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.6 km | 1.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 238 premises | 0% 453 premises |
Climate
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 460 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 22.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,663/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tasman same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons same for both | |
| Member | Rebecca White same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Murdunna | Eaglehawk Neck | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Murdunna
Other comparisons with Eaglehawk Neck
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.