Mummel vs Pomeroy
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Mummel tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pomeroy
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mummel
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (15% vs 22%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Pomeroy
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $150/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Mummel
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (153 min vs 170 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (213.7 km vs 216.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pomeroy
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 59/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mummel
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (15.2% vs -18.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mummel and Pomeroy drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mummel rents higher ($150/wk vs $100/wk); Mummel has higher household incomes ($123,448 vs $84,500).
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129 +27% vs other | 94 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +15.2% | -18.3% |
| Median age | 46 | 44 |
| Median household income | $123,448/yr +32% vs other | $84,500/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $150/wk +33% vs other | $100/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Property market
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,012,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $680,000 | — |
Zoning mix
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 332 across Goulburn Mulwaree same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -1% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 52% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 54% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 77% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 49% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 21% of NSW | Higher than 17% of NSW |
Liveability
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mummel carries more bushfire risk (16 vs 0); Mummel carries more crime risk (59 vs 13).
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 16/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 59/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 5 | 3 |
Mobility
Pomeroy sits further from the CBD (216.4 km vs 213.7 km).
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 213.7 km | 216.4 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 153 min | 170 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2580 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 2580 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.7%).
Setting
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 752 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 672 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 34 premises | 0% 20 premises |
Climate
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 658 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.7°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 10.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.36 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,370/yr same for both | |
| Council | Goulburn Mulwaree same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Eden-monaro same for both | |
| Member | Kristy Mcbain same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mummel | Pomeroy | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mummel
Other comparisons with Pomeroy
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.