Mulgrave vs South Windsor
South Windsor is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 40 in Mulgrave. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mulgrave, most households own their home. In South Windsor, about half of households rent. Houses cost more in Mulgrave: a median of $1.07 million, against $960,000 in South Windsor, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mulgrave tends to suit share households and older residents, while South Windsor suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
South Windsor
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (10 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
South Windsor
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($2,205,500 vs $3,300,000)
- has cheaper houses ($960,000 vs $1,075,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
South Windsor
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($360/wk vs $500/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mulgrave
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (8% vs 3%)
- sits closer to the CBD (54.5 km vs 60.6 km)
- But South Windsor is more walkable (57/100 vs 41/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
South Windsor
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 41/100)
- carries lower crime risk (85/100 vs 99/100)
- But Mulgrave has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 13%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
South Windsor
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1.0% vs -15.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mulgrave and South Windsor drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
South Windsor has more residents (5,948 vs 78); Mulgrave rents higher ($500/wk vs $360/wk).
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78 | 5,948 +7526% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -15.2% | +1.0% |
| Median age | 40 | 34 |
| Median household income | $94,224/yr +19% vs other | $76,232/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk +28% vs other | $360/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,075,000 | $960,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $815,500 |
| Median land price | $3,300,000 | $2,205,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 34 days from 44 sales |
Zoning mix
Mulgrave has more rural and farming land (67% vs 41%).
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 67% | 41% |
| Residential | 0% | 20% |
| Industrial | 20% | 12% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 14% | 12% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 10% |
| Environmental | 0% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 459 across Hawkesbury same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +3% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.3% $690/wk on $840K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 55% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 3% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 49% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 85% of NSW |
Liveability
South Windsor is more walkable (57 vs 41).
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 25/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
South Windsor carries more bushfire risk (62 vs 0); Mulgrave carries more crime risk (99 vs 85).
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Crime | High 99/100 | High 85/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 7 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Mulgrave
- Windsor High School Government · Secondary below peers
Schools in South Windsor
- Bede Polding College Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Chisholm Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Windsor South Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 7 |
| Childcare | 0 | 10 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
South Windsor sits further from the CBD (60.6 km vs 54.5 km).
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 41/100 | 57/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 54.5 km | 60.6 km +11% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 58 min |
| Public transport score | 53/100 Rail · Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 7.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 110.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 5.5 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2756 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 2756 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.4%).
Setting
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 15 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 36.7 km | 39.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 61/100 | 100/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 29% 373 premises | 100% 3,113 premises |
Climate
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 806 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,650/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hawkesbury same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macquarie same for both | |
| Member | Susan Templeman same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mulgrave | South Windsor | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mulgrave
Other comparisons with South Windsor
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.