Mount Waverley vs Clayton
Clayton is the younger of the two, with a median age of 28 against 40 in Mount Waverley. In Mount Waverley, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. In Clayton, most households rent. Houses cost more in Mount Waverley: a median of $1.6 million, against $1.36 million in Clayton, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mount Waverley tends to suit couples, while Clayton suits renters, young adults, and people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Waverley
ahead on 6 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (10 vs 0)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (69% vs 35%)
- is already more of a family suburb (68% vs 36%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Clayton
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($550,000 vs $905,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,365,000 vs $1,600,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Clayton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (63% vs 25%)
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $476/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Clayton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (10% vs 4%)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Waverley
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (19% vs 10%)
- carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 85/100)
- But Clayton has more units and townhouses to downsize into (64% vs 31%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Clayton
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.3% vs 3.8%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.9% vs 3.1%)
- But Mount Waverley is growing faster (5.1% vs -1.9%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Waverley and Clayton drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Waverley has more residents (35,340 vs 18,988); Mount Waverley skews older (40 vs 28).
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,340 +46% vs other | 18,988 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.1% | -1.9% |
| Median age | 40 | 28 |
| Median household income | $107,432/yr +28% vs other | $77,688/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $476/wk +16% vs other | $400/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (30.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,600,000 | $1,365,000 |
| Median unit price | $905,000 | $550,000 |
| Median land price | $1,692,500 | $1,541,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 408 sales | 25 days from 56 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
7 vs 31 sales
62 vs 126 sales
60 vs 48 sales
7 vs 9 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 8 sales
205 vs 63 sales
182 vs 17 sales
60 vs 7 sales
12 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
Clayton has more commercially zoned land (48% vs 2%); Clayton has more industrially zoned land (12% vs 0%).
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 74% | 4% |
| Commercial | 2% | 48% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 10% | 24% |
| Industrial | 0% | 12% |
| Other and special use | 6% | 11% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,233 across Monash same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -4% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.1% $850/wk on $1.44M | 3.9% $700/wk on $945K |
| Units | 3.8% $620/wk on $840K | 5.3% $550/wk on $544K |
Ranking within VIC
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 92% of VIC | Higher than 82% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 79% of VIC | Higher than 45% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 98% of VIC | Higher than 22% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 99% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 10% of VIC | Higher than 7% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 88% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 6% of VIC | Higher than 73% of VIC |
Liveability
Mount Waverley scores higher overall (90 vs 55).
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ | B |
| Score | 90/100 | 55/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Clayton carries more crime risk (85 vs 57).
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | High 85/100 |
| Flood | Low 26/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 8 within 5 km | 21 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 11 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 10 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 3.5 km | 3 Monash Clayton, 0.0 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.6% | 17.3% |
Schools in Mount Waverley
- Avila College Catholic · Secondary above peers
- Essex Heights Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Holy Family School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Huntingtower School Independent · Combined above peers
- Mount Waverley Heights Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Mount Waverley North Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Clayton
- Clayton North Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Peter's School Catholic · Primary below peers
- John Monash Science School Government · Secondary
- SEDA College (Victoria) - AFL - Clayton Independent · Secondary
- Monash Children's Hospital School Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 5 | 11 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 34 | 81 |
| Parks & reserves | 32 | 21 |
| Childcare | 25 | 14 |
| GPs | 10 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 8 | 5 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 4 |
| Police stations | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 7 | 6 |
| Fuel stations | 5 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 17 | 2 |
Mobility
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 91/100 | 97/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 22.4 km +1% vs other | 22.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 27 min | 29 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 84/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 471.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 590.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.7% postcode 3149 | 2.0% postcode 3168 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 3149 | 14 postcode 3168 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (49.9%).
Setting
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 121 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 88 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 12.6 km | 10.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 87/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 7% 15,814 premises | 49% 10,841 premises |
Climate
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 777 mm | 644 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.9°C | 26.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.3°C | 6.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ | 6.3 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | — | 20.8 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | — | 0.98 pphm |
Council rates
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,697/yr same for both | |
| Council | Monash same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Chisholm | Hotham |
| Member | Carina Garland | Clare O'Neil |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Waverley | Clayton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Waverley
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Waverley
Other comparisons with Clayton
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.