Mount Warrigal vs Oak Flats
Comparing Mount Warrigal and Oak Flats, NSW: Oak Flats has more residents (6,840 vs 4,880); Oak Flats is more walkable (88 vs 64); and Oak Flats carries more crime risk (74 vs 64).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mount Warrigal has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 82%)
- Oak Flats has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Oak Flats
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($700,000 vs $845,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Warrigal
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($405/wk vs $440/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Mount Warrigal sits closer to the CBD (103.3 km vs 109.9 km)
- Oak Flats is more walkable (88/100 vs 64/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Oak Flats
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (18% vs 2%)
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 64/100)
- But Mount Warrigal carries lower crime risk (64/100 vs 74/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Oak Flats
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.6% vs -0.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Warrigal and Oak Flats drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Oak Flats has more residents (6,840 vs 4,880).
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,880 | 6,840 +40% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.6% | +6.6% |
| Median age | 42 same for both | |
| Median household income | $70,980/yr | $77,376/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $405/wk | $440/wk +9% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $940,000 | $988,500 |
| Median unit price | $845,000 | $700,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 29 sales | 24 days from 78 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
47 vs 74 sales
30 vs 33 sales
Zoning mix
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 83% | 64% |
| Parks and recreation | 14% | 15% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 8% |
| Industrial | 0% | 7% |
| Commercial | 0% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 883 across Shellharbour same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +25% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.4% $780/wk on $928K | 4.0% $725/wk on $940K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 7% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 95% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 44% of NSW | Higher than 52% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 30% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 83% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
Liveability
Oak Flats is more walkable (88 vs 64).
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 48/100 | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Oak Flats carries more crime risk (74 vs 64).
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Mount Warrigal
- Mount Warrigal Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Oak Flats
- Balarang Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Corpus Christi Catholic High School Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Oak Flats Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Oak Flats High School Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 14 |
| Childcare | 2 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Oak Flats sits further from the CBD (109.9 km vs 103.3 km).
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 64/100 | 88/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 103.3 km | 109.9 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 99 min | 97 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 80/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 62.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 132.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2528 | 0.9% postcode 2529 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 2528 | 45 postcode 2529 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.0%).
Setting
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 38 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 17 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.4 km 3.2 km to a named beach | 4.3 km 4.3 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 55% 1,992 premises | 53% 3,270 premises |
Climate
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,788/yr same for both | |
| Council | Shellharbour same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Whitlam same for both | |
| Member | Carol Berry same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Warrigal | Oak Flats | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Warrigal
Other comparisons with Oak Flats
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.