Mount Walker vs Rosevale
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Mount Walker tends to suit families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rosevale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 33%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Rosevale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 25%)
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $330/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Walker
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (64 min vs 79 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (74.9 km vs 91.6 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Rosevale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Rosevale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (1.9% vs -3.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Walker and Rosevale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rosevale has more residents (212 vs 129); Rosevale has higher household incomes ($86,112 vs $69,836).
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 129 | 212 +64% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.7% | +1.9% |
| Median age | 44 | 46 |
| Median household income | $69,836/yr | $86,112/yr +23% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $330/wk +9% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.5%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 524 across Scenic Rim same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 37% of QLD | Higher than 60% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 29% of QLD | Higher than 64% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 62% of QLD | Higher than 63% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 36% of QLD | Higher than 28% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 70/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 4 |
Mobility
Rosevale sits further from the CBD (91.6 km vs 74.9 km).
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 74.9 km | 91.6 km +22% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 64 min | 79 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4340 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 82 postcode 4340 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.0%).
Setting
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 142 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 27/100 | 20/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 41 premises | 0% 36 premises |
Climate
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 897 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,689/yr same for both | |
| Council | Scenic Rim same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Walker | Rosevale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Walker
Other comparisons with Rosevale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.