Mount Tully vs Fletcher
Mount Tully is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 53 in Fletcher. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Fletcher, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Fletcher tends to suit people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Tully
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (56% vs 46%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 89%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Mount Tully leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 23%)
- Fletcher has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $255/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Fletcher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a shorter drive in (184 min vs 189 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Fletcher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (27% vs 17%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Fletcher
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (39.1% vs -3.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Tully and Fletcher drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Tully has higher household incomes ($74,724 vs $45,032); Mount Tully rents higher ($255/wk vs $200/wk).
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 117 | 128 +9% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.3% | +39.1% |
| Median age | 44 | 53 |
| Median household income | $74,724/yr +40% vs other | $45,032/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $255/wk +22% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
Development activity
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 291 across Southern Downs same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +63% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 45% of QLD | Higher than 7% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 13% of QLD | Higher than 53% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 46% of QLD | Higher than 72% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 42% of QLD | Higher than 30% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 69/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | Low 16/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 3 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 232.5 km | 233.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 189 min | 184 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4380 | 0.7% postcode 4381 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 57 postcode 4380 | 73 postcode 4381 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.1%).
Setting
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 990 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 777 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 22/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 54 premises | 0% 46 premises |
Climate
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 730 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.3°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,627/yr same for both | |
| Council | Southern Downs same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Maranoa same for both | |
| Member | David Littleproud same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Tully | Fletcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Tully
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Tully
Other comparisons with Fletcher
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.