Mount Saint Thomas vs Figtree
Mount Saint Thomas is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 40 in Figtree. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Figtree, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Figtree: a median of $1.18 million, against $915,000 in Mount Saint Thomas, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mount Saint Thomas tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Figtree suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Figtree
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (6 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Saint Thomas
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($915,000 vs $1,180,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Saint Thomas
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $430/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Saint Thomas
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Figtree
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (43/100 vs 55/100)
- But Mount Saint Thomas is more walkable (75/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Where they sit
Mount Saint Thomas and Figtree drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Figtree has more residents (12,335 vs 1,449); Figtree rents higher ($430/wk vs $300/wk).
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,449 | 12,335 +751% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | — | +6.7% |
| Median age | 37 | 40 |
| Median household income | $95,420/yr | $106,184/yr +11% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $430/wk +43% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915,000 | $1,180,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $630,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,300,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 24 days from 116 sales |
Zoning mix
Figtree has more land zoned for conservation (28% vs 0%).
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 83% | 50% |
| Environmental | 0% | 28% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 15% | 4% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 10% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 7% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,476 across Wollongong same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.5% $800/wk on $1.19M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $470/wk on $519K |
Ranking within NSW
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 99% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 53% of NSW |
Liveability
Mount Saint Thomas is more walkable (75 vs 48); Mount Saint Thomas scores higher overall (64 vs 51).
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 64/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Figtree carries more bushfire risk (64 vs 0); Mount Saint Thomas carries more crime risk (55 vs 43).
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 55/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 16 within 5 km | 12 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 2.4 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 4.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.7% | 3.0% |
Schools in Mount Saint Thomas
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Figtree
- Figtree Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Figtree High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Nareena Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Figtree Heights Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Childcare | 1 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 0 | 14 |
Mobility
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 86.8 km | 87.8 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 82 min | 83 min |
| Public transport score | 63/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 21.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 220.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 2500 | 1.6% postcode 2525 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 14 postcode 2500 | 41 postcode 2525 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.8%).
Setting
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 46 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.2 km 2.7 km to a named beach | 4.6 km 4.9 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 589 premises | 52% 5,004 premises |
Climate
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.66 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,751/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wollongong same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cunningham same for both | |
| Member | Alison Byrnes same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Saint Thomas | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Figtree
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Saint Thomas
Other comparisons with Figtree
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.