Mount Rascal vs Hodgson Vale
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and the large majority of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Rascal: a median of $1.58 million, against $1.15 million in Hodgson Vale, though rent is higher in Hodgson Vale. On these figures, Hodgson Vale tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hodgson Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 46/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Mount Rascal has cheaper land ($500,000 vs $1,055,000)
- Hodgson Vale has cheaper houses ($1,146,500 vs $1,576,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Rascal
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($320/wk vs $365/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hodgson Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 46/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Hodgson Vale
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (4.7% vs -14.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Rascal and Hodgson Vale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hodgson Vale has more residents (1,444 vs 393); Hodgson Vale rents higher ($365/wk vs $320/wk).
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 393 | 1,444 +267% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -14.9% | +4.7% |
| Median age | 39 same for both | |
| Median household income | $126,880/yr | $136,708/yr +8% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk | $365/wk +14% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,576,000 | $1,146,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $500,000 | $1,055,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 76 days from 5 sales | 45 days from 12 sales |
Development activity
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 93% of QLD | Higher than 95% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 3% of QLD | Higher than 64% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 69% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | A |
| Score | — | 70/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mount Rascal carries more crime risk (46 vs 18).
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 46/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 USQ (Toowoomba), 9.1 km | None |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 137.8 km | 138.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 113 min same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4350 | 0.6% postcode 4352 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 4350 | 84 postcode 4352 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.2%).
Setting
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 637 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 515 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 63/100 | 83/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 42% 207 premises | 74% 484 premises |
Climate
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 643 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 2.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 3.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Groom same for both | |
| Member | Garth Hamilton same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Rascal | Hodgson Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Rascal
Other comparisons with Hodgson Vale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.