Mount Pleasant vs Sebastopol
Mount Pleasant is the younger of the two, with a median age of 35 against 39 in Sebastopol. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Sebastopol, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Mount Pleasant: a median of $540,000, against $488,000 in Sebastopol.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Sebastopol
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools inside the suburb (6 vs 1)
- has more childcare (12 vs 2)
- has more parks and reserves (9 vs 3)
- But Mount Pleasant has more separate houses rather than flats (84% vs 73%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Sebastopol
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($390,000 vs $445,000)
- has cheaper houses ($488,000 vs $540,000)
- But Mount Pleasant has cheaper land ($210,000 vs $294,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Pleasant
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Pleasant
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (87 min vs 93 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (116.4 km vs 119.8 km)
- But Sebastopol is more walkable (82/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Sebastopol
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (27% vs 16%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 15%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Pleasant and Sebastopol drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sebastopol has more residents (10,194 vs 2,225); Mount Pleasant has higher household incomes ($70,200 vs $52,676).
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,225 | 10,194 +358% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.0% | +1.6% |
| Median age | 35 | 39 |
| Median household income | $70,200/yr +25% vs other | $52,676/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $280/wk +4% vs other | $270/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $540,000 | $488,000 |
| Median unit price | $445,000 | $390,000 |
| Median land price | $210,000 | $294,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 39 days from 13 sales | 27 days from 106 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
9 vs 54 sales
6 vs 13 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
9 vs 38 sales
32 vs 217 sales
17 vs 67 sales
Zoning mix
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 78% | 73% |
| Parks and recreation | 9% | 11% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 8% |
| Rural and farming | 7% | 3% |
| Industrial | 5% | 3% |
| Commercial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,451 across Ballarat same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +42% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $450/wk on $605K | 4.2% $440/wk on $550K |
| Units | — | 5.1% $390/wk on $400K |
Ranking within VIC
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 12% of VIC same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 32% of VIC | Higher than 11% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 25% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of VIC | Higher than 94% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 85% of VIC | Higher than 52% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of VIC | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of VIC | Higher than 79% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 59% of VIC | Higher than 77% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 66% of VIC |
Liveability
Sebastopol is more walkable (82 vs 58); Mount Pleasant scores higher overall (51 vs 41).
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 51/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 85/100 | High 87/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 12 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 6 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 2 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Federation University Ballarat, 2.2 km | 1 Federation University Ballarat, 4.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.5% | 1.1% |
Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Mount Pleasant Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Sebastopol
- Ballarat Christian College Independent · Combined at peers
- St James' School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Phoenix P-12 Community College Government · Combined below peers
- Sebastopol Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Phoenix P-12 Community College-Redan Campus Government · Combined
- Berry Street School - Ballarat Campus Independent · Secondary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 9 |
| Childcare | 2 | 12 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 4 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 5 |
Mobility
Sebastopol sits further from the CBD (119.8 km vs 116.4 km).
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 58/100 | 82/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 116.4 km | 119.8 km +3% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 87 min | 93 min |
| Public transport score | 55/100 | 76/100 |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 13.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 58.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 3350 | 0.4% postcode 3356 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 30 postcode 3350 | 31 postcode 3356 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 431 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 421 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 1,186 premises | 45% 5,983 premises |
Climate
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 605 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.5°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,086/yr same for both | |
| Council | Ballarat same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Ballarat same for both | |
| Member | Catherine King same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Pleasant | Sebastopol | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Pleasant
Sebastopol
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Other comparisons with Sebastopol
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.