Mount Pleasant vs Palmer
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Mount Pleasant: a median of $666,000, against $516,000 in Palmer. On these figures, Mount Pleasant tends to suit older residents, while Palmer suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Pleasant
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 45/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Palmer
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($185,000 vs $1,125,000)
- has cheaper houses ($515,500 vs $665,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Mount Pleasant sits closer to the CBD (67.3 km vs 72.5 km)
- Palmer is more walkable (27/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Pleasant
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 45/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 16%)
- But Palmer is more walkable (27/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Pleasant and Palmer drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Pleasant has more residents (1,058 vs 215); Palmer skews older (50 vs 48).
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,058 +80% vs other | 215 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.7% | +6.4% |
| Median age | 48 | 50 |
| Median household income | $68,692/yr +4% vs other | $65,676/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $665,500 | $515,500 |
| Median unit price | $405,000 | — |
| Median land price | $1,125,000 | $185,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 30 days from 10 sales | 79 days from 4 sales |
Zoning mix
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 99% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 180 across Barossa | 131 across Mid Murray |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% | -42% |
Ranking within SA
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 38% of SA | Higher than 33% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 31% of SA | Higher than 74% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of SA | Higher than 67% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 60% of SA | Higher than 46% of SA |
Liveability
Palmer is more walkable (27 vs 0).
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 44/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Palmer carries more crime risk (45 vs 23); Palmer carries more bushfire risk (49 vs 35).
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 35/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Flood | Low 17/100 | — |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Mount Pleasant Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Schools in Palmer
- Palmer Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 4 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 9 | 3 |
Mobility
Palmer sits further from the CBD (72.5 km vs 67.3 km).
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 27/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 67.3 km | 72.5 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 69 min | 71 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 5235 | 0.7% postcode 5237 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 78 postcode 5235 | 77 postcode 5237 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.9%).
Setting
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 434 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 194 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 482 premises | 0% 114 premises |
Climate
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 921 mm | 337 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 30.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 5.7°C |
Council rates
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,247/yr | $2,037/yr |
| Council | Barossa | Mid Murray |
Federal electorate
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Pleasant | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Other comparisons with Palmer
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.