Mount Martha vs Dromana
Mount Martha is the younger of the two, with a median age of 46 against 50 in Dromana. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Martha, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Martha: a median of $1.38 million, against $920,000 in Dromana, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mount Martha tends to suit families with children and couples, while Dromana suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Martha
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 75/100)
- has more parks and reserves (42 vs 16)
- has more childcare (12 vs 5)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Dromana
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($837,500 vs $1,675,000)
- has cheaper houses ($920,000 vs $1,376,000)
- has cheaper units ($650,000 vs $795,000)
- But Mount Martha leaves households under less mortgage stress (24% vs 32%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Dromana
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (26% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($380/wk vs $496/wk)
- But Mount Martha leaves renters under less rental stress (24% vs 29%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Martha
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (47/100 vs 17/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Martha
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 75/100)
- is more walkable (47/100 vs 17/100)
- But Dromana has more residents already 65 and over (29% vs 24%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Dromana
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is growing faster (14.2% vs 7.0%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.0% vs 4.0%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Martha and Dromana drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Martha has more residents (19,846 vs 6,626); Mount Martha has higher household incomes ($109,044 vs $67,808).
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,846 +67% vs other | 6,626 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.0% | +14.2% |
| Median age | 46 | 50 |
| Median household income | $109,044/yr +38% vs other | $67,808/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $496/wk +23% vs other | $380/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,376,000 | $920,000 |
| Median unit price | $795,000 | $650,000 |
| Median land price | $1,675,000 | $837,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 33 days from 195 sales | 38 days from 131 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
14 vs 28 sales
35 vs 11 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
11 vs 21 sales
171 vs 142 sales
182 vs 65 sales
31 vs 10 sales
Zoning mix
Dromana has more rural and farming land (69% vs 30%).
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 30% | 69% |
| Residential | 47% | 15% |
| Parks and recreation | 12% | 8% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 7% |
| Other and special use | 1% | 0% |
| Industrial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 791 across Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.8% $898/wk on $1.68M | 3.0% $700/wk on $1.2M |
| Units | 4.0% $650/wk on $840K | 5.0% $550/wk on $572K |
Ranking within VIC
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 62% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 29% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 69% of VIC | Higher than 75% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of VIC | Higher than 78% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 9% of VIC | Higher than 19% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 93% of VIC | Higher than 83% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 79% of VIC | Higher than 84% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 7% of VIC | Higher than 15% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 11% of VIC | Higher than 61% of VIC |
Liveability
Mount Martha is more walkable (47 vs 17); Mount Martha scores higher overall (71 vs 48).
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | C |
| Score | 71/100 | 48/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Dromana carries more crime risk (75 vs 23).
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 60/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 50/100 | Moderate 57/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Mount Martha
- Osborne Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Balcombe Grammar School Independent · Combined at peers
- Mount Martha Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Dromana
- Dromana Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Dromana Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Peninsula College Government · Combined · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 7 | 22 |
| Parks & reserves | 42 | 16 |
| Childcare | 12 | 5 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 9 | 32 |
Mobility
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 47/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 79.8 km | 81.1 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 65 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 94.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 54.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.8% postcode 3934 | 1.2% postcode 3936 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 3934 | 25 postcode 3936 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.4%).
Setting
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 27 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.9 km 4.5 km to a named beach | 2.5 km 2.6 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 70/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 46% 9,213 premises | 56% 5,437 premises |
Climate
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 700 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,659/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mornington Peninsula same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Flinders same for both | |
| Member | Zoe Mckenzie same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Martha | Dromana | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Martha
Other comparisons with Dromana
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.