Mount Keira vs Figtree
Comparing Mount Keira and Figtree, NSW: Figtree has more residents (12,335 vs 1,691); Figtree is more walkable (48 vs 26); and Mount Keira carries more bushfire risk (82 vs 64).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Figtree
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (6 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Keira
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (80.6 km vs 87.8 km)
- has a shorter drive in (77 min vs 83 min)
- But Figtree is more walkable (48/100 vs 26/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Figtree
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- is more walkable (48/100 vs 26/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Figtree
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.7% vs 1.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Keira and Figtree drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Figtree has more residents (12,335 vs 1,691); Mount Keira has higher household incomes ($128,752 vs $106,184).
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,691 | 12,335 +629% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.6% | +6.7% |
| Median age | 40 same for both | |
| Median household income | $128,752/yr +18% vs other | $106,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk | $430/wk +2% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,245,500 | $1,180,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $630,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,300,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 10 sales | 24 days from 116 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 83 sales
9 vs 89 sales
7 vs 29 sales
Zoning mix
Mount Keira has more land zoned for conservation (85% vs 28%).
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 85% | 28% |
| Residential | 8% | 50% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 10% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 7% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 6% | 4% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,476 across Wollongong same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.5% $800/wk on $1.19M |
| Units | — | 4.7% $470/wk on $519K |
Ranking within NSW
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 68% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 100% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 53% of NSW |
Liveability
Figtree is more walkable (48 vs 26).
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 48/100 | 51/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Keira carries more bushfire risk (82 vs 64).
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 82/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Crime | Low 34/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 12 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 4.6 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 4.1 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.1% | 3.0% |
Schools in Mount Keira
- Mount Keira Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Figtree
- Figtree Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Figtree High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Nareena Hills Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Figtree Heights Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 same for both | |
| Childcare | 0 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 2 | 14 |
Mobility
Figtree sits further from the CBD (87.8 km vs 80.6 km).
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 26/100 | 48/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 80.6 km | 87.8 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 77 min | 83 min |
| Public transport score | 67/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 26.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 220.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 2500 | 1.6% postcode 2525 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 14 postcode 2500 | 41 postcode 2525 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.8%).
Setting
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 382 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.6 km 4.7 km to a named beach | 4.6 km 4.9 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 617 premises | 52% 5,004 premises |
Climate
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.66 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,751/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wollongong same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cunningham same for both | |
| Member | Alison Byrnes same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Keira | Figtree | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Keira
Figtree
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Keira
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.