Mount Jukes vs Kuttabul
Comparing Mount Jukes and Kuttabul, QLD: Kuttabul has more residents (707 vs 373); Mount Jukes rents higher ($300/wk vs $200/wk); and Mount Jukes has higher household incomes ($113,724 vs $98,124).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kuttabul
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Jukes and Kuttabul drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kuttabul has more residents (707 vs 373); Mount Jukes rents higher ($300/wk vs $200/wk).
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 373 | 707 +90% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -5.3% | -3.2% |
| Median age | 45 | 46 |
| Median household income | $113,724/yr +14% vs other | $98,124/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +33% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $775,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $780,000 |
Development activity
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 574 across Mackay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -6% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 85% of QLD | Higher than 73% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 53% of QLD | Higher than 34% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 41% of QLD | Higher than 9% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 40% of QLD | Higher than 57% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 33/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 26/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 49/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 67/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 9 | 20 |
Mobility
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 997.6 km | 998.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 683 min | 682 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4740 | 0.1% postcode 4741 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 4740 | 70 postcode 4741 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (83.4%).
Setting
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 36 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 72 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.1 km | 13.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 28/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 135 premises | 0% 287 premises |
Climate
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,633 mm | 1,517 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.6°C | 30.8°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 14.5°C | 12.4°C |
Council rates
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,873/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mackay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dawson same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Willcox same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Jukes | Kuttabul | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Jukes
Other comparisons with Kuttabul
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.