Mount Hunter vs Picton
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Hunter, most households are couple families. In Picton, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Hunter: a median of $1.85 million, against $1.2 million in Picton, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mount Hunter tends to suit couples, while Picton suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Picton
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (10 vs 1)
- has more childcare (9 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 1)
- But Mount Hunter carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Picton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,200,000 vs $1,850,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Picton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($375/wk vs $430/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Mount Hunter sits closer to the CBD (76.9 km vs 88.5 km)
- Picton is more walkable (65/100 vs 5/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Picton
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (65/100 vs 5/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- But Mount Hunter carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Picton
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (9.7% vs 2.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Hunter and Picton drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Picton has more residents (5,282 vs 749); Mount Hunter rents higher ($430/wk vs $375/wk).
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749 | 5,282 +605% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.3% | +9.7% |
| Median age | 39 | 38 |
| Median household income | $114,400/yr | $113,412/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk +13% vs other | $375/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,850,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $510,000 |
| Median land price | — | $1,612,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 67 days from 3 sales | 37 days from 51 sales |
Zoning mix
Mount Hunter has more rural and farming land (99% vs 83%).
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 83% |
| Residential | 0% | 7% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 3% |
| Environmental | 0% | 3% |
| Industrial | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,338 across Wollondilly same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +92% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.9% $775/wk on $1.39M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Schools | — | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 49% of NSW | Higher than 60% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 75% of NSW | Higher than 77% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 73% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 18% of NSW |
Liveability
Picton is more walkable (65 vs 5); Picton scores higher overall (65 vs 59).
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 59/100 | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Picton carries more crime risk (53 vs 20).
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 11/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Mount Hunter
- Mount Hunter Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Picton
- St Anthony's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Picton High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Picton Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 10 |
| Childcare | 1 | 9 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 9 |
Mobility
Picton sits further from the CBD (88.5 km vs 76.9 km).
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 5/100 | 65/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 76.9 km | 88.5 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 72 min | 73 min |
| Public transport score | 29/100 Bus | 75/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 5.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 60.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 3 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 2570 | 0.9% postcode 2571 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2570 | 75 postcode 2571 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.6%).
Setting
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 125 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 189 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 37.3 km | 34.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 37/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 10% 263 premises | 40% 2,552 premises |
Climate
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 817 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ | 4.8 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 13.2 µg/m³ | 12.1 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm | 0.11 pphm |
Council rates
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,099/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wollondilly same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hume same for both | |
| Member | Angus Taylor same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Hunter | Picton | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Hunter
Other comparisons with Picton
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.