Mount Glorious vs Mount Samson
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Samson, most households are couple families. Mount Samson is closer to the city centre: 31.3 km, against 37.5 km. On these figures, Mount Glorious tends to suit people living alone, while Mount Samson suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mount Glorious carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 26/100)
- Mount Samson is already more of a family suburb (85% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Glorious
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($363/wk vs $435/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Samson
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (41 min vs 56 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (31.3 km vs 37.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Glorious
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 26/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 17%)
- But Mount Samson is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Glorious
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (15.9% vs 5.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Glorious and Mount Samson drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Samson has more residents (625 vs 343); Mount Samson has higher household incomes ($143,000 vs $100,048).
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 343 | 625 +82% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +15.9% | +5.2% |
| Median age | 49 | 47 |
| Median household income | $100,048/yr | $143,000/yr +43% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $363/wk | $435/wk +20% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $987,175 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 74% of QLD | Higher than 96% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 61% of QLD | Higher than 74% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 33% of QLD | Higher than 52% of QLD |
Liveability
Mount Samson is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Samson carries more crime risk (26 vs 12); Mount Glorious carries more bushfire risk (79 vs 60).
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 79/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Crime | Low 12/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Mount Glorious
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Samson
- Mount Samson State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 4 | 2 |
Mobility
Mount Glorious sits further from the CBD (37.5 km vs 31.3 km).
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 37.5 km +17% vs other | 31.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 56 min | 41 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 4520 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.9%).
Setting
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 291 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 58 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.4 km | 18.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 25/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 86 premises | 0% 208 premises |
Climate
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 950 mm | 1,032 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 30.5°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 8.9°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 13.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.74 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dickson same for both | |
| Member | Ali France same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Glorious | Mount Samson | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Glorious
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Glorious
Other comparisons with Mount Samson
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.