Mount Glorious vs Laceys Creek
Laceys Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 49 in Mount Glorious. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Laceys Creek, most households are couple families. Mount Glorious is closer to the city centre: 37.5 km, against 59.3 km. On these figures, Mount Glorious tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Laceys Creek suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mount Glorious carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 30/100)
- Laceys Creek is already more of a family suburb (68% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Laceys Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($295/wk vs $363/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Glorious
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (37.5 km vs 59.3 km)
- has a shorter drive in (56 min vs 70 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Glorious
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 30/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (23% vs 12%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Glorious
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (15.9% vs 0.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Glorious and Laceys Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Laceys Creek has higher household incomes ($131,196 vs $100,048); Mount Glorious rents higher ($363/wk vs $295/wk).
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 343 +18% vs other | 280 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +15.9% | +0.7% |
| Median age | 49 | 45 |
| Median household income | $100,048/yr | $131,196/yr +31% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $363/wk +19% vs other | $295/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $987,175 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 74% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 61% of QLD | Higher than 24% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of QLD | Higher than 87% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 33% of QLD | Higher than 30% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Laceys Creek carries more crime risk (30 vs 12); Mount Glorious carries more bushfire risk (79 vs 62).
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 79/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Crime | Low 12/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 4 | 46 |
Mobility
Laceys Creek sits further from the CBD (59.3 km vs 37.5 km).
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 37.5 km | 59.3 km +58% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 56 min | 70 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 4520 | 1.2% postcode 4521 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | — postcode 4520 | 98 postcode 4521 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.2%).
Setting
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 291 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 187 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.4 km | 29.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 25/100 | 23/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 86 premises | 0% 117 premises |
Climate
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 950 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.6 µg/m³ | 5.4 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 13.4 µg/m³ | 14.7 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.74 pphm | 0.43 pphm |
Council rates
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dickson same for both | |
| Member | Ali France same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Glorious | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Glorious
Laceys Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Glorious
Other comparisons with Laceys Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.