Mount Glasgow vs Red Lion
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Glasgow, most households are people living alone. In Red Lion, about half of households are people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Red Lion
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Glasgow
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (160.7 km vs 163.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Red Lion
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Glasgow
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.2% vs -7.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Glasgow and Red Lion drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92 | 111 +21% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.2% | -7.5% |
| Median age | 52 same for both | |
| Median household income | $62,348/yr | $68,224/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | — same for both | |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.7%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
Mount Glasgow has more land zoned for conservation (25% vs 3%).
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 74% | 65% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 31% |
| Environmental | 25% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 40 across Central Goldfields same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +129% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 23% of VIC | Higher than 29% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 16% of VIC | Higher than 12% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 35% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 12% of VIC | Higher than 2% of VIC |
Liveability
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mount Glasgow carries more crime risk (67 vs 31); Red Lion carries more flood risk (69 vs 45).
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 91/100 | High 86/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 67/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 45/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 10 | 0 |
Mobility
Red Lion sits further from the CBD (163.2 km vs 160.7 km).
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 160.7 km | 163.2 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 119 min | 118 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 3371 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 3371 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (84.4%).
Setting
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 294 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 251 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 0% 28 premises |
Climate
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 537 mm | 510 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 29.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 3.9°C |
Council rates
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,555/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Goldfields same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mallee same for both | |
| Member | Anne Webster same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Glasgow | Red Lion | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Glasgow
Other comparisons with Red Lion
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.