Mount Garnet vs Irvinebank
Mount Garnet is the younger of the two, with a median age of 50 against 57 in Irvinebank. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Irvinebank, the large majority of households are people living alone. On these figures, Irvinebank tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Irvinebank
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (62/100 vs 75/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 86%)
- But Mount Garnet is already more of a family suburb (48% vs 11%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Irvinebank
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($60/wk vs $185/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 20%)
- But Mount Garnet has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 12%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Irvinebank
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (1739.9 km vs 1789.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Mount Garnet has more units and townhouses to downsize into (14% vs 2%)
- Irvinebank carries lower crime risk (62/100 vs 75/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Garnet
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.7% vs -9.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Garnet and Irvinebank drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Garnet has more residents (532 vs 113); Mount Garnet rents higher ($185/wk vs $60/wk).
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 532 +79% vs other | 113 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +23.7% | -9.6% |
| Median age | 50 | 57 |
| Median household income | $47,892/yr +34% vs other | $31,824/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $185/wk +68% vs other | $60/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.2%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $250,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 196 days from 6 sales | — |
Development activity
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 167 across Tablelands | 76 across Mareeba |
| Approvals change year on year | -80% | -23% |
Ranking within QLD
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 10% of QLD | Higher than 1% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 22% of QLD | Higher than 38% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 13% of QLD | Higher than 16% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 43% of QLD | Higher than 13% of QLD |
Liveability
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 19/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Irvinebank carries more bushfire risk (40 vs 0); Mount Garnet carries more crime risk (75 vs 62).
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Crime | High 75/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Mount Garnet
- Mount Garnet State School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Irvinebank
- Irvinebank State School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 14 |
Mobility
Mount Garnet sits further from the CBD (1789.1 km vs 1739.9 km).
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1789.1 km +3% vs other | 1739.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1228 min same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4872 | 0.1% postcode 4887 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 55 postcode 4872 | 49 postcode 4887 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (100.0%).
Setting
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 756 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 725 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 15/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 238 premises | 0% 42 premises |
Council rates
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,609/yr | $1,628/yr |
| Council | Tablelands | Mareeba |
Federal electorate
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Garnet | Irvinebank | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Garnet
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Garnet
Other comparisons with Irvinebank
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.