Mount Direction vs Pipers River
Pipers River is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 46 in Mount Direction. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Direction, most households are couple families. In Pipers River, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Pipers River: a median of $701,000, against $600,000 in Mount Direction, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mount Direction tends to suit couples, while Pipers River suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Direction
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 63%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Direction
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($600,000 vs $701,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Direction
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($233/wk vs $260/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Direction
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (162 min vs 178 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (230 km vs 241.6 km)
- But Pipers River is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pipers River
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mount Direction and Pipers River drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pipers River has more residents (433 vs 248); Mount Direction has higher household incomes ($94,900 vs $78,416).
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 248 | 433 +75% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.8% | +1.6% |
| Median age | 46 | 43 |
| Median household income | $94,900/yr +17% vs other | $78,416/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $233/wk | $260/wk +12% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (1.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (27.4%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $600,000 | $701,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Pipers River has more land zoned for conservation (16% vs 3%); Mount Direction has more rural and farming land (97% vs 83%).
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 83% |
| Environmental | 3% | 16% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 67 across George Town same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +25% same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 87% of TAS | Higher than 69% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 41% of TAS | Higher than 77% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 78% of TAS | Higher than 79% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 45% of TAS | Higher than 34% of TAS |
Liveability
Pipers River is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Pipers River sits further from the CBD (241.6 km vs 230 km).
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Hobart | 230 km | 241.6 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 162 min | 178 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 7252 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 43 postcode 7252 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.6%).
Setting
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 98 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 100 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 19.6 km | 13.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 27/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 100 premises | 0% 167 premises |
Climate
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 676 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,438/yr same for both | |
| Council | George Town same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bass same for both | |
| Member | Jess Teesdale same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Direction | Pipers River | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Direction
Other comparisons with Pipers River
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.