Mount Cottrell vs Wyndham Vale
Wyndham Vale is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 41 in Mount Cottrell. In both, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Cottrell: a median of $770,000, against $600,000 in Wyndham Vale, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Wyndham Vale tends to suit young adults, families with children, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Wyndham Vale
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (18 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (23 vs 5)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Wyndham Vale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (23% vs 30%)
- has cheaper houses ($600,000 vs $770,000)
- But Mount Cottrell has cheaper land ($380,000 vs $587,500)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Wyndham Vale
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 30%)
- has cheaper rent ($343/wk vs $462/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Mount Cottrell sits closer to the CBD (36.4 km vs 40 km)
- Wyndham Vale is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wyndham Vale
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (18/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (73/100 vs 98/100)
- But Mount Cottrell has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 7%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield.
Where they sit
Mount Cottrell and Wyndham Vale drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wyndham Vale has more residents (20,518 vs 496); Mount Cottrell rents higher ($462/wk vs $343/wk).
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 496 | 20,518 +4037% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -12.8% | — |
| Median age | 41 | 31 |
| Median household income | $80,184/yr | $91,832/yr +15% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $462/wk +26% vs other | $343/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $770,000 | $600,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $475,000 |
| Median land price | $380,000 | $587,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 72 days from 21 sales | 38 days from 438 sales |
Zoning mix
Mount Cottrell has more land zoned for conservation (31% vs 7%); Mount Cottrell has more rural and farming land (32% vs 20%).
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 23% | 53% |
| Rural and farming | 32% | 20% |
| Environmental | 31% | 7% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 11% | 6% |
| Other and special use | 2% | 10% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,602 across Melton | 4,045 across Wyndham |
| Approvals change year on year | +5% | -0% |
Gross rental yield
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $555/wk on $750K | 3.9% $470/wk on $625K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 51% of VIC | Higher than 25% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 47% of VIC | Higher than 61% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 14% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 35% of VIC | Higher than 78% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 45% of VIC | Higher than 87% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 84% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 97% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 58% of VIC | Higher than 62% of VIC |
Liveability
Wyndham Vale is more walkable (18 vs 0).
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | C |
| Score | — | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Cottrell carries more bushfire risk (76 vs 29); Mount Cottrell carries more crime risk (98 vs 73).
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 76/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Crime | High 98/100 | High 73/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 2 |
Schools in Mount Cottrell
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Wyndham Vale
- Iramoo Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Riverbend Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Wyndham Vale Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Christway College - Wyndham Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 4 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 23 |
| Childcare | 1 | 18 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 11 | 8 |
Mobility
Wyndham Vale sits further from the CBD (40 km vs 36.4 km).
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 18/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 36.4 km | 40 km +10% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 43 min | 46 min |
| Public transport score | 43/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 7.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 142.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 5.5 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 3024 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 69 postcode 3024 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (71.6%).
Setting
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 95 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 19.6 km | 14.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 95/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 51% 456 premises | 78% 10,070 premises |
Climate
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 482 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.4 µg/m³ | — |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,779/yr | $1,997/yr |
| Council | Melton | Wyndham |
Federal electorate
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gorton | Lalor |
| Member | Alice Jordan-Baird | Joanne Ryan |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mount Cottrell | Wyndham Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Cottrell
Wyndham Vale
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mount Cottrell
Other comparisons with Wyndham Vale
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.