Moe vs Tanjil South
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Moe, about half of households are people living alone. In Tanjil South, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Tanjil South: a median of $792,000, against $464,000 in Moe, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Moe tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Tanjil South suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Moe has more parks and reserves (26 vs 1)
- Tanjil South carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 95/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Moe
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($464,500 vs $791,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Moe
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (36% vs 8%)
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $235/wk)
- But Tanjil South leaves renters under less rental stress (13% vs 22%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Moe
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (85/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (99 min vs 117 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (134.3 km vs 146 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Moe
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (85/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- But Tanjil South carries lower crime risk (28/100 vs 95/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Moe
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.8% vs -0.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Moe and Tanjil South drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Moe has more residents (9,375 vs 540); Tanjil South has higher household incomes ($94,588 vs $46,904).
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,375 +94% vs other | 540 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.8% | -0.7% |
| Median age | 46 | 47 |
| Median household income | $46,904/yr | $94,588/yr +102% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk | $235/wk +18% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $464,500 | $791,500 |
| Median unit price | $271,000 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 30 days from 87 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Tanjil South has more rural and farming land (66% vs 42%).
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 42% | 66% |
| Residential | 32% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 9% | 29% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 1% |
| Industrial | 6% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 3% |
| Commercial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 529 across Latrobe (Vic.) | 619 across Baw Baw |
| Approvals change year on year | +66% | +49% |
Gross rental yield
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.9% $470/wk on $500K | — |
| Units | 5.3% $335/wk on $330K | — |
Ranking within VIC
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 8% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 8% of VIC | Higher than 66% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 18% of VIC | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 95% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 57% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 22% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 46% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 97% of VIC | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 75% of VIC | — |
Liveability
Moe is more walkable (85 vs 0).
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D same for both | |
| Score | 19/100 | 23/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Moe carries more crime risk (95 vs 28); Moe carries more flood risk (85 vs 68).
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 99/100 | High 97/100 |
| Crime | High 95/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Flood | High 85/100 | Moderate 68/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Moe
- Moe (Albert Street) Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- St Kieran's School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Moe (South Street) Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Moe Primary School Government · Primary below peers
- Baringa School Government · Combined · Special school
Schools in Tanjil South
- Tanjil South Primary School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 26 | 1 |
| Childcare | 8 | 0 |
| GPs | 5 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 3 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 5 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 6 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 102 |
Mobility
Tanjil South sits further from the CBD (146 km vs 134.3 km).
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 85/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 134.3 km | 146 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 99 min | 117 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 3825 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 38 postcode 3825 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.4%).
Setting
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 71 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 68 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 71/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 48% 5,788 premises | 0% 225 premises |
Climate
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 700 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 4.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 7.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.56 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,746/yr | $2,138/yr |
| Council | Latrobe (Vic.) | Baw Baw |
Federal electorate
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Moe | Tanjil South | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Moe
Other comparisons with Tanjil South
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.