Mitchell Park vs Sturt
In Mitchell Park, about half of households rent and about half of households are people living alone. In Sturt, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Mitchell Park is closer to the city centre: 11.3 km, against 14 km. On these figures, Mitchell Park tends to suit renters.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mitchell Park has more schools inside the suburb (5 vs 0)
- Sturt has more separate houses rather than flats (67% vs 54%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mitchell Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($550,000 vs $812,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mitchell Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (52% vs 41%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mitchell Park
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (9% vs 3%)
- sits closer to the CBD (11.3 km vs 14 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Mitchell Park has more units and townhouses to downsize into (46% vs 33%)
- Sturt carries lower crime risk (70/100 vs 81/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Mitchell Park and Sturt drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mitchell Park has more residents (5,754 vs 2,787).
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,754 +52% vs other | 2,787 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.3% | +10.1% |
| Median age | 37 | 38 |
| Median household income | $60,320/yr | $63,544/yr +5% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $278/wk | $295/wk +6% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $906,000 | $875,000 |
| Median unit price | $550,000 | $812,500 |
| Median land price | $890,000 | $845,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 61 sales | 18 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
109 vs 45 sales
28 vs 9 sales
Zoning mix
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 88% | 86% |
| Industrial | 5% | 8% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 4% |
| Commercial | 1% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $680/wk on $895K | 4.1% $695/wk on $884K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 55% of SA | Higher than 42% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 28% of SA | — |
| Schools | Higher than 47% of SA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of SA | Higher than 98% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 14% of SA | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of SA | Higher than 81% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 80% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 53% of SA | Higher than 63% of SA |
Liveability
Mitchell Park scores higher overall (54 vs 46).
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 54/100 | 46/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Sturt carries more flood risk (80 vs 26); Mitchell Park carries more crime risk (81 vs 70).
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 81/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | Low 26/100 | High 80/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.1 km | 2 Bedford Park, 1.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.4% | 3.2% |
Schools in Mitchell Park
- Hamilton Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Clovelly Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Sacred Heart College - Champagnat Campus Catholic · Combined
- Sports College South Australia - Mitchell Park Campus Independent · Secondary
- Suneden Specialist School Independent · Combined · Special school
Schools in Sturt
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 3 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Sturt sits further from the CBD (14 km vs 11.3 km).
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 82/100 | 88/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 11.3 km | 14 km +24% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 19 min | 21 min |
| Public transport score | 90/100 Rail · Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 71.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 83.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 5043 | 1.2% postcode 5047 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 5043 | 54 postcode 5047 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.2%).
Setting
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 35 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 47 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 4.6 km | 3.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 3,043 premises | 2% 1,371 premises |
Climate
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr same for both | |
| Council | Marion same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mitchell Park | Sturt | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mitchell Park
Sturt
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mitchell Park
Other comparisons with Sturt
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.