Mitchell vs Mount Panorama
Mitchell is the younger of the two, with a median age of 30 against 53 in Mount Panorama. In Mitchell, the large majority of households rent and most households are people living alone. In Mount Panorama, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Panorama: a median of $2.6 million, against $320,000 in Mitchell, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Mitchell tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Mount Panorama suits couples and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mitchell has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
- Mount Panorama has more separate houses rather than flats (117% vs 30%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mitchell
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($320,000 vs $2,600,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mitchell
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (81% vs 13%)
- has cheaper rent ($215/wk vs $485/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mitchell
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (58/100 vs 27/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mitchell
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (58/100 vs 27/100)
- carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 91/100)
- But Mount Panorama has more residents already 65 and over (39% vs 2%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mitchell and Mount Panorama drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mitchell has more residents (1,179 vs 101); Mount Panorama has higher household incomes ($108,316 vs $40,508).
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,179 +91% vs other | 101 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -10.0% | -12.9% |
| Median age | 30 | 53 |
| Median household income | $40,508/yr | $108,316/yr +167% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $215/wk | $485/wk +126% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $320,000 | $2,600,000 |
| Median unit price | $465,500 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Mount Panorama has more rural and farming land (38% vs 0%); Mitchell has more land zoned for conservation (26% vs 0%).
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure and transport | 54% | 62% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 38% |
| Environmental | 26% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 14% | 0% |
| Residential | 3% | 0% |
| Industrial | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 177 across Bathurst same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -23% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 8% of NSW | Higher than 91% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 5% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 80% of NSW | Higher than 10% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 63% of NSW |
Liveability
Mitchell is more walkable (58 vs 27).
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 43/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Panorama carries more bushfire risk (15 vs 0); Mount Panorama carries more crime risk (91 vs 44).
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 44/100 | High 91/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Mitchell
- Carenne School Government · Combined · Special school
- Skillset Senior College Independent · Secondary · Special school
Schools in Mount Panorama
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 6 | 1 |
Mobility
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 58/100 | 27/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 210.7 km | 212.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 183 min | 184 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2795 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2795 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (81.4%).
Setting
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 714 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 792 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 33/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 35% 216 premises | 4% 52 premises |
Climate
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 666 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 1.1°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,301/yr same for both | |
| Council | Bathurst same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mitchell | Mount Panorama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mitchell
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mitchell
Other comparisons with Mount Panorama
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.