Mitcham vs Vermont
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Mitcham, about half of households are couple families. In Vermont, most households are couple families. On these figures, Mitcham tends to suit people living alone.
Vermont scores notably higher on liveability (84 versus 70) and has virtually no bushfire risk compared to Mitcham's score of 89, making it the safer choice in that regard. Mitcham is slightly closer to the CBD at 25.9 km and offers marginally better rental yields on both houses and units. Crime risk is lower in Vermont at 49 compared to Mitcham's 62, though Mitcham has a lower flood risk. Vermont suits buyers prioritising safety and community amenity, while Mitcham may appeal to those seeking proximity to the city and rental income potential.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mitcham has more parks and reserves (30 vs 15)
- Vermont carries lower crime risk (40/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mitcham
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 68/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (25.9 km vs 28.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mitcham
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 2)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (37% vs 20%)
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 68/100)
- But Vermont carries lower crime risk (40/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mitcham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on units (4.3% vs 3.6%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Mitcham and Vermont drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mitcham has more residents (16,795 vs 10,993).
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,795 +35% vs other | 10,993 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.0% | +5.3% |
| Median age | 39 | 40 |
| Median household income | $105,560/yr | $106,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $406/wk | $426/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,200,500 | $1,282,500 |
| Median unit price | $760,000 | $828,000 |
| Median land price | $870,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 156 sales | 26 days from 107 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
67 vs 12 sales
43 vs 15 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
119 vs 86 sales
82 vs 78 sales
15 vs 22 sales
Zoning mix
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 73% same for both | |
| Parks and recreation | 9% | 13% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 10% | 7% |
| Industrial | 6% | 7% |
| Commercial | 2% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 879 across Whitehorse same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +17% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $725/wk on $1.15M | 3.2% $730/wk on $1.18M |
| Units | 4.3% $600/wk on $728K | 3.6% $650/wk on $945K |
Ranking within VIC
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 83% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 78% of VIC |
| Schools | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 97% of VIC | Higher than 89% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 23% of VIC | Higher than 22% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 93% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 85% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 26% of VIC | Higher than 24% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 20% of VIC | Higher than 2% of VIC |
Liveability
Mitcham is more walkable (91 vs 68); Vermont scores higher overall (84 vs 71).
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 71/100 | 84/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Mitcham carries more bushfire risk (90 vs 0); Vermont carries more flood risk (31 vs 20).
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 90/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 60/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Flood | Low 20/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 4 | 3 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 8.5 km | 1 Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 7.8 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Schools in Mitcham
- Antonio Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Mullauna Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- Rangeview Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- St John's School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Mitcham Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Vermont
- St James' School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Vermont Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Vermont Secondary College Government · Secondary above peers
- St Timothy's School Catholic · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 23 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 30 | 15 |
| Childcare | 12 | 8 |
| GPs | 4 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 1 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Vermont sits further from the CBD (28.4 km vs 25.9 km).
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 91/100 | 68/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 25.9 km | 28.4 km +10% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 31 min | 34 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 334.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 149.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.9% postcode 3132 | 1.9% postcode 3133 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 3132 | 37 postcode 3133 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (51.0%).
Setting
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 136 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 138 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 20.5 km | 19.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 8,051 premises | 2% 4,470 premises |
Climate
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 777 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.3°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | — same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,516/yr same for both | |
| Council | Whitehorse same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Deakin same for both | |
| Member | Matt Gregg same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mitcham | Vermont | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Vermont
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mitcham
Other comparisons with Vermont
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.