Millers Forest vs Osterley
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Millers Forest: a median of $1.45 million, against $1.25 million in Osterley. On these figures, Osterley tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Osterley
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 64/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (88% vs 79%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Osterley
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 24%)
- has cheaper houses ($1,250,000 vs $1,450,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Millers Forest
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (119 min vs 128 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (162.8 km vs 172.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Osterley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (18/100 vs 64/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Osterley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.8% vs 6.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Millers Forest and Osterley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Millers Forest has more residents (357 vs 132); Osterley has higher household incomes ($133,224 vs $102,492).
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 357 +63% vs other | 132 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.6% | +12.8% |
| Median age | 47 same for both | |
| Median household income | $102,492/yr | $133,224/yr +30% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $395/wk | $400/wk +1% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.9%).
Property market
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,450,000 | $1,250,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 89% | 96% |
| Environmental | 11% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,413 across Maitland | 495 across Port Stephens |
| Approvals change year on year | +20% | -72% |
Ranking within NSW
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 73% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 69% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 51% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
Liveability
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Millers Forest carries more crime risk (64 vs 18).
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Millers Forest
- Millers Forest Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Osterley
- Mount Kanwary Public School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 12 | 0 |
Mobility
Osterley sits further from the CBD (172.9 km vs 162.8 km).
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 25/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 162.8 km | 172.9 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 119 min | 128 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2324 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 2324 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (62.1%).
Setting
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 10.4 km | 14.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 137 premises | 0% 46 premises |
Climate
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,181 mm | 996 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C | 30.0°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.5°C | 7.1°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,908/yr | $1,359/yr |
| Council | Maitland | Port Stephens |
Federal electorate
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Paterson | Lyne |
| Member | Meryl Swanson | Alison Penfold |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | The Nationals |
First Home Owner Grant
| Millers Forest | Osterley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Millers Forest
Other comparisons with Osterley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.