Miller vs Hoxton Park
In both, most homes are detached houses. In Miller, most households rent. In Hoxton Park, most households own their home and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Hoxton Park: a median of $1.17 million, against $969,000 in Miller, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Miller tends to suit renters, people living alone, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Hoxton Park suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hoxton Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (43/100 vs 95/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (86% vs 57%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Miller has cheaper houses ($969,250 vs $1,170,000)
- Hoxton Park leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 50%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Miller
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (66% vs 26%)
- has cheaper rent ($201/wk vs $490/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Miller
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 71/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (43.6 km vs 46.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Miller
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (32% vs 11%)
- has more GPs (5 vs 2)
- is more walkable (80/100 vs 71/100)
- But Hoxton Park carries lower crime risk (43/100 vs 95/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Miller and Hoxton Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hoxton Park rents higher ($490/wk vs $201/wk); Hoxton Park has higher household incomes ($101,920 vs $42,900).
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,374 | 4,572 +36% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.2% | +5.0% |
| Median age | 35 same for both | |
| Median household income | $42,900/yr | $101,920/yr +138% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $201/wk | $490/wk +144% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $969,250 | $1,170,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 27 days from 10 sales | 25 days from 15 sales |
Zoning mix
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 76% | 63% |
| Parks and recreation | 19% | 9% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 17% |
| Environmental | 0% | 6% |
| Industrial | 0% | 4% |
| Commercial | 4% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,229 across Liverpool same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +28% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.7% $760/wk on $1.05M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 53% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 6% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 77% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 92% of NSW | Higher than 89% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 10% of NSW | Higher than 58% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 39% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 60% of NSW |
Liveability
Hoxton Park scores higher overall (56 vs 47); Miller is more walkable (80 vs 71).
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 47/100 | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Hoxton Park carries more bushfire risk (42 vs 0); Miller carries more crime risk (95 vs 43).
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 42/100 |
| Crime | High 95/100 | Moderate 43/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 6 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 3.5 km | 1 50 Scott Street Liverpool, 5.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 1.5% | 3.2% |
Schools in Miller
- St Therese Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Miller High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Miller Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Hoxton Park
- Good Shepherd Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Hoxton Park Public School Government · Primary below peers
- Malek Fahd Islamic School Hoxton Park Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 4 |
| Childcare | 7 | 5 |
| GPs | 5 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 1 | 9 |
Mobility
Hoxton Park sits further from the CBD (46.9 km vs 43.6 km).
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 80/100 | 71/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 43.6 km | 46.9 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 44 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 62.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 68.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 2168 | 1.1% postcode 2171 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 38 postcode 2168 | 57 postcode 2171 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.9%).
Setting
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.9 km | 26.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 76/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 4% 1,423 premises | 37% 1,360 premises |
Climate
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 909 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.4°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.72 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,322/yr same for both | |
| Council | Liverpool same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Werriwa same for both | |
| Member | Anne Maree Stanley same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Miller | Hoxton Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Miller
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Miller
Other comparisons with Hoxton Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.