Milendella vs Palmer
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. On these figures, Palmer tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Milendella carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 45/100)
- Palmer has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Milendella
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent.
Commuting to the city
Palmer
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (27/100 vs 0/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (72.5 km vs 83.3 km)
- has a shorter drive in (71 min vs 81 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Milendella
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 45/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 16%)
- But Palmer is more walkable (27/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Palmer
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (6.4% vs -6.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Milendella and Palmer drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Palmer rents higher ($250/wk vs $0/wk); Palmer has more residents (215 vs 56).
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56 | 215 +284% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -6.7% | +6.4% |
| Median age | 49 | 50 |
| Median household income | $66,248/yr | $65,676/yr |
| Median weekly rent | — | $250/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.8%).
Property market
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $515,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $185,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 79 days from 4 sales |
Zoning mix
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 99% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 131 across Mid Murray same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -42% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 34% of SA | Higher than 33% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 37% of SA | Higher than 74% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 67% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 36% of SA | Higher than 46% of SA |
Liveability
Palmer is more walkable (27 vs 0).
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Palmer carries more bushfire risk (49 vs 0); Palmer carries more crime risk (45 vs 29).
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 49/100 |
| Crime | Low 29/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Milendella
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Palmer
- Palmer Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 4 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
Milendella sits further from the CBD (83.3 km vs 72.5 km).
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 27/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 83.3 km +13% vs other | 72.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 81 min | 71 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5237 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 77 postcode 5237 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.9%).
Setting
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 151 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 194 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 25/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 21 premises | 0% 114 premises |
Climate
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 337 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,037/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mid Murray same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Barker same for both | |
| Member | Tony Pasin same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Milendella | Palmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Milendella
Other comparisons with Palmer
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.