Merritts Creek vs Mount Luke
Mount Luke is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 43 in Merritts Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Merritts Creek tends to suit families with children, while Mount Luke suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Luke
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 74%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Merritts Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 24%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Luke
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($295/wk vs $485/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 23%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Luke
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (126 min vs 133 min)
- But Merritts Creek sits closer to the CBD (149.2 km vs 155.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Luke
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Luke
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (21.4% vs 15.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Merritts Creek and Mount Luke drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Merritts Creek has more residents (102 vs 51); Merritts Creek rents higher ($485/wk vs $295/wk).
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102 +50% vs other | 51 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +15.9% | +21.4% |
| Median age | 43 | 39 |
| Median household income | $110,500/yr +12% vs other | $97,448/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $485/wk +39% vs other | $295/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Development activity
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,513 across Toowoomba same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -25% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 83% of QLD | Higher than 70% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 51% of QLD | Higher than 71% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 68% of QLD | Higher than 67% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of QLD | Higher than 38% of QLD |
Liveability
Mount Luke is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Mount Luke carries more bushfire risk (33 vs 0).
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 33/100 |
| Crime | Low 11/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Luke sits further from the CBD (155.5 km vs 149.2 km).
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 149.2 km | 155.5 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 133 min | 126 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 4352 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 84 postcode 4352 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.7%).
Setting
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 598 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 621 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 31 premises | 0% 20 premises |
Climate
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 577 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,618/yr same for both | |
| Council | Toowoomba same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Groom same for both | |
| Member | Garth Hamilton same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Merritts Creek | Mount Luke | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Merritts Creek
Mount Luke
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Merritts Creek
Other comparisons with Mount Luke
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.