Melrose Park vs Pasadena
Melrose Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 38 against 49 in Pasadena. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. Melrose Park is closer to the city centre: 8.4 km, against 9.9 km. On these figures, Melrose Park tends to suit families with children, while Pasadena suits older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pasadena
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($590,000 vs $650,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Melrose Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (88/100 vs 79/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Melrose Park is more walkable (88/100 vs 79/100)
- Pasadena has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 18%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pasadena
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.1% vs 3.2%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Melrose Park and Pasadena drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pasadena has more residents (3,073 vs 2,319); Pasadena skews older (49 vs 38).
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,319 | 3,073 +33% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.9% | +2.7% |
| Median age | 38 | 49 |
| Median household income | $82,316/yr +13% vs other | $71,812/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +5% vs other | $333/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,120,500 | $1,160,000 |
| Median unit price | $650,000 | $590,000 |
| Median land price | $740,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 17 days from 24 sales | 18 days from 19 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 15 sales
11 vs 12 sales
Zoning mix
Melrose Park has more industrially zoned land (39% vs 0%); Pasadena has more land zoned for conservation (12% vs 0%).
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 61% | 64% |
| Industrial | 39% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 23% |
| Environmental | 0% | 12% |
| Commercial | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.2% $700/wk on $1.12M | 4.1% $750/wk on $945K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 82% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 58% of SA | Higher than 45% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 97% of SA | Higher than 92% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 43% of SA | Higher than 7% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 79% of SA | Higher than 89% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 96% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 23% of SA | Higher than 68% of SA |
Liveability
Melrose Park is more walkable (88 vs 79); Pasadena scores higher overall (62 vs 57).
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 57/100 | 62/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Melrose Park carries more flood risk (82 vs 66).
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 80/100 | High 73/100 |
| Flood | High 82/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.6 km | 3 Tonsley, 1.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.4% | 3.0% |
Schools in Melrose Park
- Edwardstown Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Pasadena
- Springbank Secondary College Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 7 |
| Childcare | 1 | 3 |
| GPs | 1 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| EV chargers | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 88/100 | 79/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 8.4 km | 9.9 km +18% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 14 min | 18 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 57.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 100.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 5039 | 1.5% postcode 5042 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 55 postcode 5039 | 54 postcode 5042 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (70.4%).
Setting
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 39 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 73 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.2 km | 7.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 90/100 | 66/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 73% 1,393 premises | 35% 1,498 premises |
Climate
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitcham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Melrose Park | Pasadena | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Pasadena
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Melrose Park
Other comparisons with Pasadena
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.