Mcgraths Hill vs Pitt Town Bottoms
Pitt Town Bottoms is the younger of the two, with a median age of 29 against 34 in McGraths Hill. In both, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Pitt Town Bottoms: a median of $2.45 million, against $1.1 million in McGraths Hill, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, McGraths Hill tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Pitt Town Bottoms suits young adults and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Mcgraths Hill has more separate houses rather than flats (92% vs 56%)
- Pitt Town Bottoms is already more of a family suburb (100% vs 77%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
McGraths Hill
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($1,105,000 vs $2,450,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 31%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
McGraths Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($450/wk vs $600/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
McGraths Hill
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (56/100 vs 17/100)
- has a shorter drive in (54 min vs 60 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (55.1 km vs 59.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
McGraths Hill
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (56/100 vs 17/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (11% vs 4%)
- But Pitt Town Bottoms has more units and townhouses to downsize into (44% vs 8%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
McGraths Hill
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-0.6% vs -16.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mcgraths Hill and Pitt Town Bottoms drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
McGraths Hill has more residents (2,537 vs 85); Pitt Town Bottoms has higher household incomes ($169,000 vs $113,204).
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,537 +97% vs other | 85 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.6% | -16.7% |
| Median age | 34 | 29 |
| Median household income | $113,204/yr | $169,000/yr +49% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk | $600/wk +33% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,105,000 | $2,450,000 |
| Median unit price | $783,500 | — |
| Median land price | — | $925,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 29 days from 33 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Pitt Town Bottoms has more rural and farming land (86% vs 65%); Pitt Town Bottoms has more land zoned for conservation (14% vs 2%).
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 65% | 86% |
| Residential | 24% | 0% |
| Environmental | 2% | 14% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 5% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 459 across Hawkesbury same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +3% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.6% $900/wk on $1.02M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 78% of NSW | Higher than 98% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 83% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 67% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 47% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 78% of NSW | Higher than 56% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 91% of NSW | — |
Liveability
McGraths Hill is more walkable (56 vs 17).
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 67/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 35/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Moderate 50/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 2 |
Mobility
Pitt Town Bottoms sits further from the CBD (59.3 km vs 55.1 km).
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 56/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 55.1 km | 59.3 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 60 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 2756 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 46 postcode 2756 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.7%).
Setting
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 35.3 km | 34.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 72/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 49% 956 premises | 0% 45 premises |
Climate
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 806 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.23 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,650/yr same for both | |
| Council | Hawkesbury same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macquarie same for both | |
| Member | Susan Templeman same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mcgraths Hill | Pitt Town Bottoms | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mcgraths Hill
Pitt Town Bottoms
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mcgraths Hill
Other comparisons with Pitt Town Bottoms
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.