Mccracken vs Victor Harbor
Victor Harbor is the younger of the two, with a median age of 59 against 64 in McCracken. In both, most households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and most households are people living alone. Houses cost more in McCracken: a median of $805,000, against $740,000 in Victor Harbor, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, McCracken tends to suit older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Victor Harbor
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (10 vs 1)
- has more childcare (5 vs 1)
- has more schools inside the suburb (3 vs 0)
- But McCracken carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Mccracken has cheaper units ($210,000 vs $561,000)
- Victor Harbor has cheaper land ($352,500 vs $810,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Victor Harbor
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (30% vs 20%)
- has cheaper rent ($267/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
McCracken
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (55/100 vs 44/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
McCracken
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (50/100 vs 66/100)
- is more walkable (55/100 vs 44/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (49% vs 41%)
- But Victor Harbor has more GPs (2 vs 0)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Mccracken and Victor Harbor drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Victor Harbor has more residents (4,520 vs 2,076); McCracken has higher household incomes ($52,312 vs $45,864).
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,076 | 4,520 +118% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.0% | +6.8% |
| Median age | 64 | 59 |
| Median household income | $52,312/yr +12% vs other | $45,864/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +11% vs other | $267/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (11.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805,000 | $740,000 |
| Median unit price | $210,000 | $561,000 |
| Median land price | $810,000 | $352,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 20 sales | 22 days from 72 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 75 sales
15 vs 34 sales
Zoning mix
Victor Harbor has more rural and farming land (21% vs 0%).
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 85% | 36% |
| Rural and farming | 0% | 21% |
| Parks and recreation | 10% | 20% |
| Commercial | 4% | 6% |
| Industrial | 1% | 5% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 4% |
| Environmental | 0% | 4% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 347 across Victor Harbor same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -26% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.4% $555/wk on $845K | 3.6% $550/wk on $800K |
| Units | — | 3.3% $455/wk on $710K |
Ranking within SA
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 17% of SA | Higher than 11% of SA |
| Schools | — | Higher than 10% of SA |
| Walkability | Higher than 82% of SA | Higher than 79% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of SA same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 28% of SA | Higher than 32% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 4% of SA |
Liveability
McCracken scores higher overall (39 vs 25); McCracken is more walkable (55 vs 44).
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | D |
| Score | 39/100 | 25/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Victor Harbor carries more crime risk (66 vs 50); Victor Harbor carries more flood risk (77 vs 66).
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 50/100 | Moderate 66/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 66/100 | High 77/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 3 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 3 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Mccracken
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Victor Harbor
- Investigator College Independent · Combined at peers
- Victor Harbor High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Victor Harbor Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 3 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 10 |
| Childcare | 1 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 4 |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 7 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 3 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 55/100 | 44/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 81.8 km | 83.3 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 71 min | 72 min |
| Public transport score | 25/100 | 32/100 |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 7.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 2.5 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5211 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 5211 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.7%).
Setting
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 21 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 827 m 3.8 km to a named beach | 1.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 | 96/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 95% 1,328 premises | 91% 3,563 premises |
Climate
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 786 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,533/yr same for both | |
| Council | Victor Harbor same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mccracken | Victor Harbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mccracken
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mccracken
Other comparisons with Victor Harbor
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.