Mawbanna vs South Forest
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mawbanna, most households are couple families. In South Forest, about half of households are couple families. On these figures, Mawbanna tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mawbanna
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Mawbanna
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (30% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($180/wk vs $225/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mawbanna
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (383.8 km vs 402.1 km)
- has a shorter drive in (283 min vs 288 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Where they sit
Mawbanna and South Forest drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
South Forest has higher household incomes ($74,724 vs $49,348); South Forest rents higher ($225/wk vs $180/wk).
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 84 | 100 +19% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -37.8% | — |
| Median age | 41 | 43 |
| Median household income | $49,348/yr | $74,724/yr +51% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $180/wk | $225/wk +25% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (29.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Property market
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
South Forest has more rural and farming land (100% vs 84%); Mawbanna has more land zoned for conservation (16% vs 0%).
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 84% | 100% |
| Environmental | 16% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7 across Circular Head same for both | |
Ranking within TAS
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 20% of TAS | Higher than 64% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of TAS | Higher than 66% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 43% of TAS | Higher than 6% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 21% of TAS | Higher than 72% of TAS |
Liveability
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Mawbanna carries more bushfire risk (68 vs 0).
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 68/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 1 |
Mobility
South Forest sits further from the CBD (402.1 km vs 383.8 km).
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 383.8 km | 402.1 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 283 min | 288 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 7321 | 0.1% postcode 7330 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 26 postcode 7321 | 23 postcode 7330 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (66.7%).
Setting
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 140 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 15.2 km | 7.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 39 premises | 0% 38 premises |
Climate
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,454 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 20.8°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.2°C same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Braddon same for both | |
| Member | Anne Urquhart same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mawbanna | South Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
South Forest
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mawbanna
Other comparisons with South Forest
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.