Maudsland vs Oxenford
Maudsland is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 37 in Oxenford. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Maudsland, most households are couple families. In Oxenford, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Maudsland: a median of $1.3 million, against $1.12 million in Oxenford, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Maudsland tends to suit families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Maudsland carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 67/100)
- Oxenford has more parks and reserves (42 vs 6)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Oxenford
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($1,080,500 vs $2,350,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,120,000 vs $1,300,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Oxenford
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($435/wk vs $540/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Oxenford
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (45/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (48 min vs 53 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (61.5 km vs 65.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Oxenford
ahead on 4 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (45/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (27% vs 2%)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- But Maudsland carries lower crime risk (35/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Maudsland
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (45.0% vs 3.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Maudsland and Oxenford drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Oxenford has more residents (12,273 vs 8,073); Maudsland has higher household incomes ($133,952 vs $95,264).
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,073 | 12,273 +52% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +45.0% | +3.6% |
| Median age | 34 | 37 |
| Median household income | $133,952/yr +29% vs other | $95,264/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $540/wk +19% vs other | $435/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,300,000 | $1,120,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $680,000 |
| Median land price | $2,350,000 | $1,080,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 38 days from 88 sales | 20 days from 133 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
15 vs 81 sales
124 vs 154 sales
29 vs 33 sales
Development activity
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.8% $958/wk on $1.29M | 4.1% $860/wk on $1.09M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 94% of QLD | Higher than 69% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 47% of QLD | Higher than 85% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of QLD | Higher than 86% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 44% of QLD | Higher than 59% of QLD |
Liveability
Oxenford is more walkable (45 vs 0); Maudsland scores higher overall (46 vs 41).
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 46/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Oxenford carries more crime risk (67 vs 35).
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 58/100 | Moderate 52/100 |
| Crime | Low 35/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Maudsland
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Oxenford
- Gaven State School Government · Primary at peers
- Oxenford State School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 42 |
| Childcare | 2 | 9 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 3 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 5 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 11 |
Mobility
Maudsland sits further from the CBD (65.2 km vs 61.5 km).
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 45/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 65.2 km +6% vs other | 61.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 53 min | 48 min |
| Public transport score | 23/100 Bus | 74/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 2.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 31.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 26 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 4210 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 86 postcode 4210 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.9%).
Setting
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 37 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 20 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 12.4 km | 9.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 86/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 75% 1,980 premises | 34% 5,017 premises |
Climate
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ | 5.0 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 19.3 µg/m³ | 14.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.91 pphm | 0.42 pphm |
Council rates
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gold Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright | Fadden |
| Member | Scott Buchholz | Cameron Caldwell |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Maudsland | Oxenford | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Maudsland
Oxenford
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Maudsland
Other comparisons with Oxenford
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.