Maroochy River vs Mount Coolum
In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Maroochy River, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Maroochy River: a median of $1.6 million, against $1.41 million in Mount Coolum. On these figures, Maroochy River tends to suit couples, while Mount Coolum suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Maroochy River
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (96% vs 62%)
- is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 56%)
- But Mount Coolum has more parks and reserves (8 vs 5)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Coolum
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,410,000 vs $1,600,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Maroochy River leaves renters under less rental stress (21% vs 27%)
- Mount Coolum has a bigger rental market to choose from (30% vs 15%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mount Coolum
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (40/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Coolum
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (40/100 vs 0/100)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (38% vs 4%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Coolum
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.7% vs 3.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Maroochy River and Mount Coolum drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Coolum has more residents (4,545 vs 1,667); Maroochy River has higher household incomes ($111,904 vs $87,880).
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,667 | 4,545 +173% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.9% | +6.6% |
| Median age | 42 | 44 |
| Median household income | $111,904/yr +21% vs other | $87,880/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $460/wk +2% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,600,000 | $1,410,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $880,000 |
| Median land price | $1,722,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 17 sales | 22 days from 41 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 45 sales
5 vs 10 sales
Development activity
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.0% $1,100/wk on $1.9M | 3.7% $920/wk on $1.3M |
| Units | — | 5.3% $835/wk on $825K |
Ranking within QLD
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 83% of QLD | Higher than 62% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 58% of QLD | Higher than 85% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 80% of QLD | Higher than 92% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 84% of QLD | Higher than 76% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 11% of QLD | Higher than 34% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 78% of QLD |
Liveability
Mount Coolum is more walkable (40 vs 0); Maroochy River scores higher overall (67 vs 52).
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 67/100 | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Coolum carries more bushfire risk (55 vs 0).
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 8 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 16 | 1 |
Mobility
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 40/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 114.8 km | 115.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 92 min | 95 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 4561 | 1.7% postcode 4573 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 99 postcode 4561 | 59 postcode 4573 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (74.1%).
Setting
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.9 km | 1.6 km 3.2 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 74/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 55% 746 premises | 37% 2,139 premises |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ | 5.0 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 12.3 µg/m³ | 14.0 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | — | 0.31 pphm |
Council rates
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fairfax same for both | |
| Member | Ted O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Maroochy River | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Maroochy River
Other comparisons with Mount Coolum
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.