Marino vs Seacliff Park
Seacliff Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 47 in Marino. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Marino, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Marino: a median of $1.42 million, against $1.18 million in Seacliff Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Marino tends to suit couples, while Seacliff Park suits people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget.
Marino and Seacliff Park are neighbouring suburbs with notably different profiles. Marino has a higher median household income at $108,732 versus $88,036, sits in the top socio-economic decile, and offers better rental yield on houses at 3.7% compared to 3.2%. Seacliff Park, however, is significantly more walkable with a score of 70 against Marino's 36, and carries no bushfire risk compared to Marino's 41. Crime risk is lower in Marino at 25 versus 48 in Seacliff Park. Marino suits buyers prioritising affluence and safety, while Seacliff Park appeals to those valuing walkability and proximity to local amenities.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Marino
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 3)
- carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 48/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (68% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Marino has cheaper land ($650,000 vs $948,000)
- Seacliff Park has cheaper houses ($1,175,000 vs $1,422,182)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Seacliff Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (21% vs 11%)
- has cheaper rent ($370/wk vs $400/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Seacliff Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 36/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Seacliff Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 3%)
- is more walkable (70/100 vs 36/100)
- But Marino carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 48/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Marino
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.7% vs 3.2%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Marino and Seacliff Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Marino has higher household incomes ($108,732 vs $88,036); Marino skews older (47 vs 41).
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,277 | 2,644 +16% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.6% | +8.4% |
| Median age | 47 | 41 |
| Median household income | $108,732/yr +19% vs other | $88,036/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk +8% vs other | $370/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (12.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,422,182 | $1,175,000 |
| Median unit price | $680,000 | $665,000 |
| Median land price | $650,000 | $948,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 14 sales | 26 days from 27 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 47 sales
16 vs 28 sales
Zoning mix
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 44% | 53% |
| Environmental | 49% | 39% |
| Industrial | 7% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 809 across Marion same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.7% $980/wk on $1.4M | 3.2% $750/wk on $1.2M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 68% of SA | Higher than 42% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 67% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 76% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 62% of SA | Higher than 68% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 84% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 86% of SA same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 35% of SA | Higher than 23% of SA |
Liveability
Seacliff Park is more walkable (70 vs 36); Seacliff Park scores higher overall (65 vs 60).
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 60/100 | 65/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Marino carries more bushfire risk (41 vs 0); Seacliff Park carries more crime risk (48 vs 25).
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 41/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Low 25/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 53/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Bedford Park, 5.8 km | 2 Bedford Park, 4.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.4% | 2.0% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 19.6 km +1% vs other | 19.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 29 min | 25 min |
| Public transport score | 81/100 Rail · Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 15.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 86.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.4% postcode 5049 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 67 postcode 5049 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.6%).
Setting
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 90 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 118 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 806 m | 1.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 75/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 949 premises | 2% 1,195 premises |
Climate
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 19.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.34 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,782/yr same for both | |
| Council | Marion same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Marino | Seacliff Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Marino
Seacliff Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Marino
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.