Marcoola vs Mount Coolum
In both, most households own their home. In Mount Coolum, most homes are detached houses. Houses cost more in Mount Coolum: a median of $1.41 million, against $1.29 million in Marcoola, and rent is higher there too.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Coolum
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 64/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (62% vs 43%)
- is already more of a family suburb (56% vs 47%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Marcoola
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (41% vs 30%)
- has cheaper rent ($406/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Marcoola sits closer to the CBD (110.9 km vs 115.9 km)
- Mount Coolum is more walkable (40/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Coolum
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (40/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (24/100 vs 64/100)
- But Marcoola has more units and townhouses to downsize into (57% vs 38%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Coolum
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.7% vs 2.3%)
- returns a higher gross yield on units (5.3% vs 3.7%)
Weighs house yield, unit yield, and population growth.
Where they sit
Marcoola and Mount Coolum drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Coolum has more residents (4,545 vs 3,355); Mount Coolum has higher household incomes ($87,880 vs $72,852).
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,355 | 4,545 +35% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.7% | +6.6% |
| Median age | 45 | 44 |
| Median household income | $72,852/yr | $87,880/yr +21% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $406/wk | $450/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,291,000 | $1,410,000 |
| Median unit price | $890,000 | $880,000 |
| Median land price | $2,662,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 40 days from 17 sales | 22 days from 41 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
12 vs 48 sales
23 vs 45 sales
6 vs 10 sales
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 6 sales
61 vs 19 sales
38 vs 17 sales
Development activity
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.3% $805/wk on $1.8M | 3.7% $920/wk on $1.3M |
| Units | 3.7% $690/wk on $972K | 5.3% $835/wk on $825K |
Ranking within QLD
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 42% of QLD | Higher than 62% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 45% of QLD | Higher than 85% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of QLD | Higher than 92% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 72% of QLD | Higher than 76% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 3% of QLD | Higher than 34% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 20% of QLD | Higher than 78% of QLD |
Liveability
Mount Coolum is more walkable (40 vs 0); Mount Coolum scores higher overall (52 vs 29).
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | B |
| Score | 29/100 | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Marcoola carries more crime risk (64 vs 24).
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 46/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 8 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 1 |
Mobility
Mount Coolum sits further from the CBD (115.9 km vs 110.9 km).
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 40/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 110.9 km | 115.9 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 95 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 56/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 37.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 12.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 4564 | 1.7% postcode 4573 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 65 postcode 4564 | 59 postcode 4573 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.6%).
Setting
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 2 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.8 km 2.1 km to a named beach | 1.6 km 3.2 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 60/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 27% 2,374 premises | 37% 2,139 premises |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fairfax same for both | |
| Member | Ted O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Marcoola | Mount Coolum | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Marcoola
Mount Coolum
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Marcoola
Other comparisons with Mount Coolum
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.