Mandurama vs Panuara
Panuara is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 50 in Mandurama. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mandurama, the large majority of households own their home. In Panuara, about half of households rent and most households are couple families. On these figures, Mandurama tends to suit people living alone, while Panuara suits renters, families with children, and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Panuara
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 36/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (72% vs 52%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Panuara
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (52% vs 14%)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 20%)
- But Mandurama has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $275/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Mandurama
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (230 min vs 244 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (277.3 km vs 288.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Panuara
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 36/100)
Weighs GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Panuara
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (22.9% vs -2.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Mandurama and Panuara drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mandurama has more residents (345 vs 86); Panuara has higher household incomes ($117,000 vs $65,884).
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 345 +75% vs other | 86 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -2.8% | +22.9% |
| Median age | 50 | 34 |
| Median household income | $65,884/yr | $117,000/yr +78% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $250/wk | $275/wk +10% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Property market
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $350,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $175,000 | — |
Zoning mix
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 99% |
| Environmental | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 51 across Blayney same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +14% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 7% of NSW | — |
| Income | Higher than 28% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 47% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 94% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 60% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 44% of NSW | Higher than 35% of NSW |
Liveability
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Mandurama carries more crime risk (36 vs 13); Mandurama carries more bushfire risk (29 vs 18).
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 29/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Crime | Low 36/100 | Low 13/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 28 | 17 |
Mobility
Panuara sits further from the CBD (288.7 km vs 277.3 km).
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 5/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 277.3 km | 288.7 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 230 min | 244 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 2792 | 0.6% postcode 2800 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 2792 | 48 postcode 2800 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.6%).
Setting
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 664 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 656 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 25/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 195 premises | 0% 19 premises |
Climate
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 894 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.3°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.2°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $925/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blayney same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Calare same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Gee same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Mandurama | Panuara | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mandurama
Panuara
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Mandurama
Other comparisons with Panuara
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.