Main Arm vs Upper Burringbar
Main Arm is the younger of the two, with a median age of 45 against 49 in Upper Burringbar. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Main Arm, about half of households are couple families. In Upper Burringbar, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Main Arm: a median of $2.05 million, against $1.65 million in Upper Burringbar, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Main Arm tends to suit couples, while Upper Burringbar suits people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Main Arm is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 42%)
- Upper Burringbar carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Upper Burringbar
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,650,000 vs $2,050,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Upper Burringbar
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $450/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Main Arm
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (499 min vs 515 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (772.4 km vs 784.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Upper Burringbar
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 58/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 16%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Main Arm
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (9.2% vs 3.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Main Arm and Upper Burringbar drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Main Arm has more residents (640 vs 289); Main Arm has higher household incomes ($72,956 vs $54,184).
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 640 +55% vs other | 289 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +9.2% | +3.6% |
| Median age | 45 | 49 |
| Median household income | $72,956/yr +26% vs other | $54,184/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk +22% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,050,000 | $1,650,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Main Arm has more land zoned for conservation (26% vs 1%); Upper Burringbar has more rural and farming land (79% vs 69%).
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 69% | 79% |
| Environmental | 26% | 1% |
| Other and special use | 6% | 21% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 129 across Byron | 331 across Tweed |
| Approvals change year on year | -65% | -50% |
Ranking within NSW
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 86% of NSW | Higher than 50% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 14% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 57% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 6% of NSW | Higher than 21% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 89% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 46% of NSW | Higher than 29% of NSW |
Liveability
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 28/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Main Arm carries more crime risk (58 vs 20); Upper Burringbar carries more bushfire risk (71 vs 60).
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 60/100 | High 71/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 58/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 4 | 3 |
Mobility
Upper Burringbar sits further from the CBD (784.7 km vs 772.4 km).
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 16/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 772.4 km | 784.7 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 499 min | 515 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 2482 | 1.2% postcode 2483 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 89 postcode 2482 | 72 postcode 2483 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (72.4%).
Setting
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 32 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 116 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.2 km | 12.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 20/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 222 premises | 0% 136 premises |
Climate
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,569 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr | $1,745/yr |
| Council | Byron | Tweed |
Federal electorate
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Richmond same for both | |
| Member | Justine Elliot same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Main Arm | Upper Burringbar | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Main Arm
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.