Macclesfield vs Meadows
Meadows is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 47 in Macclesfield. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Macclesfield, about half of households are couple families. In Meadows, most households are couple families. On these figures, Macclesfield tends to suit people living alone, while Meadows suits families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Meadows
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 62%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Macclesfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper land ($360,000 vs $1,300,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Macclesfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($308/wk vs $343/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Meadows
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (44.4 km vs 46.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Macclesfield
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 14%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Meadows
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (25.4% vs 4.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Macclesfield and Meadows drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Meadows has higher household incomes ($102,128 vs $83,460); Macclesfield skews older (47 vs 39).
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,413 | 1,717 +22% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.5% | +25.4% |
| Median age | 47 | 39 |
| Median household income | $83,460/yr | $102,128/yr +22% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $308/wk | $343/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $987,000 | $1,000,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $360,000 | $1,300,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 48 days from 15 sales | 22 days from 15 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 17 sales
9 vs 15 sales
Zoning mix
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 94% same for both | |
| Residential | 3% | 2% |
| Environmental | 0% | 3% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 657 across Mount Barker same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -7% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.0% $720/wk on $1.84M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 2% of SA | Higher than 4% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 59% of SA | Higher than 81% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 75% of SA same for both | |
| Affordability | Higher than 96% of SA | Higher than 98% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 92% of SA | Higher than 75% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 93% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 1% of SA |
Liveability
Macclesfield scores higher overall (63 vs 43).
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 63/100 | 43/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Meadows carries more bushfire risk (72 vs 16).
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 16/100 | High 72/100 |
| Crime | Low 11/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Macclesfield
- Macclesfield Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Meadows
- Meadows Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 4 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 2 |
| Waterways | 1 | 3 |
Mobility
Macclesfield sits further from the CBD (46.4 km vs 44.4 km).
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 28/100 | 32/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 46.4 km +4% vs other | 44.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 45 min | 44 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.8% postcode 5153 | 0.9% postcode 5201 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 86 postcode 5153 | 99 postcode 5201 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.4%).
Setting
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 295 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 328 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 32.7 km | 25.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 83/100 | 81/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 77% 650 premises | 73% 796 premises |
Climate
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 466 mm | 730 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 27.8°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 5.7°C |
Council rates
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,485/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mount Barker same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Macclesfield | Meadows | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Macclesfield
Other comparisons with Meadows
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.